HemaSphere (Feb 2023)

Baseline 18F-FDG Metabolic Tumor Volume Predicts Response to Rituximab Induction in Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Study

  • David Morland,
  • Lukshe Kanagaratnam,
  • Fabrice Hubelé,
  • Elise Toussaint,
  • Sylvain Choquet,
  • Aurélie Kas,
  • Pierre-Ambroise Caquot,
  • Corinne Haioun,
  • Emmanuel Itti,
  • Stéphane Leprêtre,
  • Pierre Decazes,
  • Fontanet Bijou,
  • Paul Schwartz,
  • Caroline Jacquet,
  • Adrien Chauchet,
  • Julien Matuszak,
  • Nassim Kamar,
  • Pierre Payoux,
  • K-VIROGREF Study Group*,
  • Eric Durot

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000833
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 2
p. e833

Abstract

Read online

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a rare complication of immunosuppression. Sequential treatment is commonly proposed, combining induction with rituximab (R-induction) followed by either continuation of treatment or addition of chemotherapy depending on response. Response to R-induction, often assessed by CT scan, is a major predictor of overall survival (OS). The aim of the study was to analyze predictive factors of R-induction response, including total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV), and investigate the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in response assessment. This retrospective multicenter study is based on patients with PTLD included in the K-VIROGREF cohort. Only patients treated by R-induction with a baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT were included. Response to R-induction was assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT. The optimal threshold of TMTV for rituximab response was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify predictive factors of response. A total of 67 patients were included. Survival characteristics were similar to those previously reported: the complete response rate to R-induction was 30%, the 3-year OS estimate was 66%, and the treatment-related mortality was 4%. The optimal threshold for TMTV to predict R-induction response was 135 cm3. The response rate to R-induction was 38% in the 21 patients with TMTV ≥ 135 cm3 and 72% in the 46 patients with TMTV < 135 cm3. TMTV was a significant predictor of response, both at univariate and multivariate analyses (odd ratios = 3.71, P = 0.022). Baseline TMTV is predictive of response to R-induction. Early assessment of patient response is feasible with 18F-FDG PET/CT.