Pain Research and Management (Jan 2016)

Research Priorities in the Field of Posttraumatic Pain and Disability: Results of a Transdisciplinary Consensus-Generating Workshop

  • David M. Walton,
  • James M. Elliott,
  • Joshua Lee,
  • Eldon Loh,
  • Joy C. MacDermid,
  • Siobhan Schabrun,
  • Walter L. Siqueira,
  • Brian D. Corneil,
  • Bill Aal,
  • Trevor Birmingham,
  • Amy Brown,
  • Lynn K. Cooper,
  • James P. Dickey,
  • S. Jeffrey Dixon,
  • Douglas D. Fraser,
  • Joseph S. Gati,
  • Gregory B. Gloor,
  • Gordon Good,
  • David Holdsworth,
  • Samuel A. McLean,
  • Wanda Millard,
  • Jordan Miller,
  • Jackie Sadi,
  • David A. Seminowicz,
  • J. Kevin Shoemaker,
  • Gunter P. Siegmund,
  • Theodore Vertseegh,
  • Timothy H. Wideman

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1859434
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2016

Abstract

Read online

Background. Chronic or persistent pain and disability following noncatastrophic “musculoskeletal” (MSK) trauma is a pervasive public health problem. Recent intervention trials have provided little evidence of benefit from several specific treatments for preventing chronic problems. Such findings may appear to argue against formal targeted intervention for MSK traumas. However, these negative findings may reflect a lack of understanding of the causal mechanisms underlying the transition from acute to chronic pain, rendering informed and objective treatment decisions difficult. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis (IMHA) has recently identified better understanding of causal mechanisms as one of three priority foci of their most recent strategic plan. Objectives. A 2-day invitation-only active participation workshop was held in March 2015 that included 30 academics, clinicians, and consumers with the purpose of identifying consensus research priorities in the field of trauma-related MSK pain and disability, prediction, and prevention. Methods. Conversations were recorded, explored thematically, and member-checked for accuracy. Results. From the discussions, 13 themes were generated that ranged from a focus on identifying causal mechanisms and models to challenges with funding and patient engagement. Discussion. Novel priorities included the inclusion of consumer groups in research from the early conceptualization and design stages and interdisciplinary longitudinal studies that include evaluation of integrated phenotypes and mechanisms.