HLA evolutionary divergence score after donor lymphocyte infusion following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Sophie Le Grand,
Juliette Villemonteix,
Etienne Daguindau,
Marylise Fort,
Sophie Caillat‐Zucman,
Vincent Allain,
Anne Dormoy,
Veronique De Mas,
Eric Delabesse,
Christian Recher,
Regis Peffault de Latour,
Nicolas Vallet,
David Michonneau,
Sarah Guenounou,
Anne Huynh
Affiliations
Sophie Le Grand
Hematology Department Centre Hospitalo‐universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse‐Oncopole (IUCT‐O), Université de Toulouse, UPS Toulouse France
Juliette Villemonteix
Immunology and Histocompatibility Laboratory Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP‐HP), Saint Louis Hospital Paris France
Etienne Daguindau
Service d'Hématologie, Jean Minjoz Hospital Besançon France
Marylise Fort
Immunology Laboratory Centre Hospitalo‐universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, UPS Toulouse France
Sophie Caillat‐Zucman
Immunology and Histocompatibility Laboratory Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP‐HP), Saint Louis Hospital Paris France
Vincent Allain
INSERM UMR 1342 Saint Louis Hospital, Université de Paris Cité Paris France
Anne Dormoy
Etablissement Français du sang, Hôpital Jean Minjoz Besançon France
Veronique De Mas
Hematology Laboratory Centre Hospitalo‐universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse‐Oncopole (IUCT‐O), Université de Toulouse, UPS Toulouse France
Eric Delabesse
Hematology Laboratory Centre Hospitalo‐universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse‐Oncopole (IUCT‐O), Université de Toulouse, UPS Toulouse France
Christian Recher
Hematology Department Centre Hospitalo‐universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse‐Oncopole (IUCT‐O), Université de Toulouse, UPS Toulouse France
Regis Peffault de Latour
Hematology Transplantation Department Saint Louis Hospital Paris France
Nicolas Vallet
Department of Clinical Haematology and Cell Therapy University Hospital of Tours, Inserm U1069 N2COx Tours France
David Michonneau
INSERM UMR 1342 Saint Louis Hospital, Université de Paris Cité Paris France
Sarah Guenounou
Hematology Department Centre Hospitalo‐universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse‐Oncopole (IUCT‐O), Université de Toulouse, UPS Toulouse France
Anne Huynh
Hematology Department Centre Hospitalo‐universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse‐Oncopole (IUCT‐O), Université de Toulouse, UPS Toulouse France
Abstract Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) prevents acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) relapses following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Given the life‐threatening toxicities such as graft versus host disease (GVHD), the identification of variables associated with response without toxicities is warranted. We hypothesized that HLA evolutionary divergence (HED), defined by the diversity between two given alleles of the same HLA gene, may be such a factor. A retrospective multicenter case‐control study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of pre‐emptive (preDLI) and prophylactic DLI (proDLI) regarding their HED score, in AML or MDS patients. DLI‐treated patients were matched with controls (1:2 matched) from French transplantation centers according to hospital, hemopathy, donor type, and risk classification. In total, 201 patients were included (N = 147 in the preDLI group, N = 54 in the proDLI group). Relapse‐free survival was significantly better in the preDLI group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14–0.55, p < 0.001) than in controls. However, this benefit was offset by a higher incidence of severe GVHD (HR = 4.88, 95% CI: 2.30–10.32, p < 0.001). HED A, B, C, DQA1, DQB1, DPB1, and DRB1 were calculated for 65 DLI‐treated patients. High‐class II HED was significantly associated with higher GVHD and relapse‐free survival (GRFS, HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.20–0.77, p = 0.005). Specific DQAB associations directly improved GRFS (HR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.09–0.58, p = 0.004). In conclusion, screening the class II HED score identifies patients eligible for DLI treatment who will benefit the most from this strategy.