PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Conventional rotator cuff versus all-suture anchors-A biomechanical study focusing on the insertion angle in an unlimited cyclic model.

  • Dimitris Ntalos,
  • Kay Sellenschloh,
  • Gerd Huber,
  • Daniel Briem,
  • Klaus Püschel,
  • Michael M Morlock,
  • Karl-Heinz Frosch,
  • Florian Fensky,
  • Till Orla Klatte

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225648
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 11
p. e0225648

Abstract

Read online

PURPOSE:The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of an all-suture anchor to a conventional anchor used commonly in rotator cuff repairs. Furthermore, the biomechanical influence of various implantation angles was evaluated in both anchor types in a human cadaveric model. METHODS:30 humeri were allocated into three groups with a similar bone density. The two different anchor types were inserted at a predefined angle of 45°, 90° or 110°. Biomechanical testing included an initial preload of 20N followed by a cyclic protocol with a stepwise increasing force of 0,05N for each cycle at a rate of 1Hz until system failure. Number of cycles, maximum load to failure, stiffness, displacement and failure mode were determined. RESULTS:27 anchors failed by pullout. There was no significant difference between the conventional and the all-suture anchor regarding mean pullout strength. No considerable discrepancy in stiffness or displacement could be perceived. Comparing the three implantation angles no significant difference could be observed for the all-suture or the conventional anchor. CONCLUSION:All-suture anchors show similar biomechanical properties to conventional screw shaped anchors in an unlimited cyclic model. The exact insertion angle is not a significant predictor of failure.