Bone & Joint Open (Jan 2023)

A scoping review of the outcome reporting following surgery for chronic osteomyelitis of the lower limb

  • Julian Camilleri-Brennan,
  • Sophie James,
  • Catriona McDaid,
  • Joy Adamson,
  • Katherine Jones,
  • Grace O'Carroll,
  • Zohaib Akhter,
  • Momin Eltayeb,
  • Hemant Sharma

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.43.BJO-2022-0109.R1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 3
pp. 146 – 157

Abstract

Read online

Aims: Chronic osteomyelitis (COM) of the lower limb in adults can be surgically managed by either limb reconstruction or amputation. This scoping review aims to map the outcomes used in studies surgically managing COM in order to aid future development of a core outcome set. Methods: A total of 11 databases were searched. A subset of studies published between 1 October 2020 and 1 January 2011 from a larger review mapping research on limb reconstruction and limb amputation for the management of lower limb COM were eligible. All outcomes were extracted and recorded verbatim. Outcomes were grouped and categorized as per the revised Williamson and Clarke taxonomy. Results: A total of 3,303 records were screened, of which 99 studies were included. Most studies were case series (77/99; 78%) and assessed one method of reconstruction (68/99; 69%). A total of 511 outcomes were reported, which were grouped into 58 distinct outcomes. Overall, 143/511 of all outcomes (28%) were provided with a clear, in-text definition, and 231 outcomes (45%) had details reported of how and when they were measured. The most commonly reported outcome was ‘recurrence of osteomyelitis’ (62; 12%). The single-most patient-reported outcome measure was ‘pain’. Conclusion: This study has highlighted significant inconsistencies in the defining, reporting, and measuring of outcomes across studies investigating surgical management for chronic osteomyelitis of the lower limb in adults. Future studies should clearly report complete details of how outcomes are defined and measured, including timing. The development of a standardized core outcome set would be of significant benefit in order to allow evidence synthesis and comparison across studies. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(3):146–157.

Keywords