Cancer Medicine (Feb 2024)

Treatments, prognostic factors, and genetic heterogeneity in advanced cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter real‐world study

  • Alessandro Ottaiano,
  • Mariachiara Santorsola,
  • Anna Diana,
  • Andrea Belli,
  • Maria Luisa Lentini Graziano,
  • Jessica Orefice,
  • Renato Patrone,
  • Annabella Di Mauro,
  • Giosuè Scognamiglio,
  • Fabiana Tatangelo,
  • Mario De Bellis,
  • Mauro Piccirillo,
  • Francesco Fiore,
  • Salvatore Stilo,
  • Luca Tarotto,
  • Marco Correra,
  • Sara Di Lorenzo,
  • Maurizio Capuozzo,
  • Antonio Avallone,
  • Lucrezia Silvestro,
  • Antonella Bianco,
  • Vincenza Granata,
  • Piera Federico,
  • Vincenzo Montesarchio,
  • Bruno Daniele,
  • Francesco Izzo,
  • Guglielmo Nasti

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6892
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 4
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background and Aims Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a rare and aggressive hepatobiliary malignancy, presents significant clinical management challenges. Despite rising incidence and evolving treatment options, prognosis remains poor, motivating the exploration of real‐world data for enhanced understanding and patient care. Methods This multicenter study analyzed data from 120 metastatic CCA patients at three institutions from 2016 to 2023. Kaplan–Meier curves assessed overall survival (OS), while univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated links between clinical variables (age, gender, tumor site, metastatic burden, ECOG performance status, response to first‐line chemotherapy) and OS. Genetic profiling was conducted selectively. Results Enrolled patients had a median age of 68.5 years, with intrahepatic tumors predominant in 79 cases (65.8%). Among 85 patients treated with first‐line chemotherapy, cisplatin and gemcitabine (41.1%) was the most common regimen. Notably, one‐third received no systemic treatment. After a median 14‐month follow‐up, 81 CCA‐related deaths occurred, with a median survival of 13.1 months. Two clinical variables independently predicted survival: response to first‐line chemotherapy (disease control vs. no disease control; HR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.14–0.50; p 1 site vs. 1 site; HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.04–3.80; p = 0.0366). The three most common genetic alterations involved the ARID1A, tp53, and CDKN2A genes. Conclusions Advanced CCA displays aggressive clinical behavior, emphasizing the need for treatments beyond chemotherapy. Genetic diversity supports potential personalized therapies. Collaborative research and deeper CCA biology understanding are crucial to enhance patient outcomes in this challenging malignancy.

Keywords