Journal of Clinical Medicine (Nov 2022)

The Safety Profile of COVID-19 Vaccines in Patients Diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Observational Study

  • Giorgia Teresa Maniscalco,
  • Cristina Scavone,
  • Annamaria Mascolo,
  • Valentino Manzo,
  • Elio Prestipino,
  • Gaspare Guglielmi,
  • Maria Luisa Aiezza,
  • Santolo Cozzolino,
  • Adele Bracco,
  • Ornella Moreggia,
  • Daniele Di Giulio Cesare,
  • Antonio Rosario Ziello,
  • Angela Falco,
  • Marida Massa,
  • Massimo Majolo,
  • Eliana Raiola,
  • Roberto Soprano,
  • Giuseppe Russo,
  • Giuseppe Longo,
  • Vincenzo Andreone,
  • Annalisa Capuano

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226855
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 22
p. 6855

Abstract

Read online

In the current COVID-19 pandemic, patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) are considered to be one of the highest priority categories, being recognized as extremely vulnerable people. For this reason, mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines are strongly recommended for these patients. Despite encouraging results on the efficacy and safety profile of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, to date, in frail populations, including patients diagnosed with MS, this information is rather limited. We carried out a retrospective observational study with the aim to evaluate the safety profile of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines by retrieving real-life data of MS patients who were treated and vaccinated at the Multiple Sclerosis Center of the Hospital A.O.R.N. A. Cardarelli. Three-hundred and ten medical records of MS patients who received the first dose of the mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine were retrieved (63% female; mean age: 45.9 years). Of these patients, 288 also received the second dose. All patients received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRSM) was the most common form of MS. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) values were p < 0.05). In conclusion, our results indicated that Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was safe for MS patients, being associated with AEFIs already detected in the general population. Larger observational studies with longer follow-up and epidemiological studies are strongly needed.

Keywords