Frontiers in Immunology (Feb 2024)

CD4/CD8 ratio and CD8+ T-cell count as prognostic markers for non-AIDS mortality in people living with HIV. A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Raquel Ron,
  • Raquel Ron,
  • Raquel Ron,
  • Javier Martínez-Sanz,
  • Javier Martínez-Sanz,
  • Sabina Herrera,
  • Luis Ramos-Ruperto,
  • Alejandro Díez-Vidal,
  • Talía Sainz,
  • Noelia Álvarez-Díaz,
  • Andrea Correa-Pérez,
  • Andrea Correa-Pérez,
  • Andrea Correa-Pérez,
  • Alfonso Muriel,
  • Alfonso Muriel,
  • Jesús López-Alcalde,
  • Jesús López-Alcalde,
  • Jesús López-Alcalde,
  • José A. Pérez-Molina,
  • José A. Pérez-Molina,
  • José A. Pérez-Molina,
  • Santiago Moreno,
  • Santiago Moreno,
  • Santiago Moreno,
  • Sergio Serrano-Villar,
  • Sergio Serrano-Villar,
  • Sergio Serrano-Villar

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1343124
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundIn people living with HIV (PLHIV), the CD4/CD8 ratio has been proposed as a useful marker for non-AIDS events. However, its predictive ability on mortality over CD4 counts, and the role of CD8+ T-cell counts remain controversial.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies from 1996 to 2023, including PLHIV on antiretroviral treatment, and reporting CD4/CD8 ratio or CD8+ counts. The primary outcome was non-AIDS mortality or all-cause mortality. We performed a standard random-effects pairwise meta-analysis comparing low versus high CD4/CD8 ratio with a predefined cut-off point of 0.5. (CRD42020170931).FindingsWe identified 2,479 studies for screening. 20 studies were included in the systematic review. Seven studies found an association between low CD4/CD8 ratio categories and increased mortality risk, with variable cut-off points between 0.4-1. Four studies were selected for meta-analysis, including 12,893 participants and 618 reported deaths. Patients with values of CD4/CD8 ratio below 0.5 showed a higher mortality risk (OR 3.65; 95% CI 3.04 - 4.35; I2 = 0.00%) compared to those with higher values. While the meta-analysis of CD8+ T-cell counts was not feasible due to methodological differences between studies, the systematic review suggests a negative prognostic impact of higher values (>1,138 to 1,500 cells/uL) in the long term.ConclusionsOur results support the use of the CD4/CD8 ratio as a prognostic marker in clinical practice, especially in patients with values below 0.5, but consensus criteria on ratio timing measurement, cut-off values, and time to event are needed in future studies to get more robust conclusions.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020170931, identifier CRD42020170931.

Keywords