Journal of Extracellular Vesicles (Oct 2022)

Transfection reagent artefact likely accounts for some reports of extracellular vesicle function

  • Russell E. McConnell,
  • Madeleine Youniss,
  • Bhargavee Gnanasambandam,
  • Palak Shah,
  • Wei Zhang,
  • Jonathan D. Finn

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jev2.12253
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 10
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EV) are important mediators of cell communication and physiology. EVs are frequently investigated by transiently transfecting cells with plasmid DNA to produce EVs modified with protein(s) or nucleic acid(s) of interest. DNA‐transfection reagent complexes (DTC) are approximately the same size as EVs, raising the possibility that some purification procedures may fail to separate these two species and activity arising from carryover DTC may be improperly attributed to EVs. We find that differential ultracentrifugation, a commonly employed EV isolation procedure, does not separate EVs from DTC present in the cell culture supernatant of transiently transfected cells. We demonstrate that the biological activity of an EV‐directed Cre recombinase is due to contaminating plasmid DNA and not EV‐mediated delivery of Cre protein. Moreover, steps commonly taken to remove plasmid DNA from EV samples, such as media exchanges and treatment with nucleases, are ineffective at avoiding this artefact. Due to the pernicious nature of plasmid DNA in these cellular assays, some reports of EV function are likely artefacts produced by contaminating DTC. EVs and DTC can be separated by density gradient ultracentrifugation, highlighting the importance of validating elimination of DTC when using transient transfection of EV‐producing cells to interrogate EV function.

Keywords