Brain Stimulation (May 2022)

Tolerability and feasibility of at-home remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (RS-tDCS): Single-center evidence from 6,779 sessions

  • Giuseppina Pilloni,
  • Amy Vogel-Eyny,
  • Matthew Lustberg,
  • Pamela Best,
  • Martin Malik,
  • Lillian Walton-Masters,
  • Allan George,
  • Ibraheem Mirza,
  • Lana Zhovtis,
  • Abhishek Datta,
  • Marom Bikson,
  • Lauren Krupp,
  • Leigh Charvet

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 3
pp. 707 – 716

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: The ability to deploy transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at home is a key usability advantage to support scaling for pivotal clinical trials. We have established a home-based tDCS protocol for use in clinical trials termed remotely supervised (RS)-tDCS. Objective: To report the tolerability and feasibility of tDCS sessions completed to date using RS-tDCS in clinical trials. Methods: We analyzed tolerability (i.e., adverse events, AEs) reported in six Class I/II/III trials using RS-tDCS to study symptom outcomes over 10 to 60 daily applications. Across the six clinical trials, 308 participants (18–78 years old) completed an average of 23 sessions for a total of 6779 RS-tDCS administrations. The majority of participants were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, and open-label trials included those diagnosed with a range of other conditions (e.g., Parkinson's disease, post-stroke aphasia, traumatic brain injury, cerebellar ataxia), with minimum-to-severe neurologic disability. Clinical trial feasibility (i.e., treatment fidelity and blinding integrity) was examined using two Class I randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results: No serious AEs occurred. Across administrations, three sessions (0.04%) were aborted due to discomfort, but no participant discontinued due to tolerability. The AEs most commonly reported by participants were tingling (68%), itching (41%) and warmth sensation (42%) at the electrode site, and these were equally reported in active and sham tDCS conditions. The two Class I RCTs resulted in rapid enrollment, high fidelity to treatment completion, and blinding integrity. Conclusions: At-home RS-tDCS is tolerable, including when used over extended periods of time. Home-based RS-tDCS is feasible and can enable Class I tDCS clinical trial designs.

Keywords