Trauma Care (Aug 2022)

Evaluating Post-Injury Functional Status among Patients Presenting for Emergency Care in Kigali, Rwanda

  • Enyonam Odoom,
  • Stephanie C. Garbern,
  • Oliver Y. Tang,
  • Catalina González Marqués,
  • Aly Beeman,
  • Doris Uwamahoro,
  • Andrew H. Stephen,
  • Chantal Uwamahoro,
  • Adam R. Aluisio

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare2030036
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 3
pp. 434 – 444

Abstract

Read online

Despite high injury-related morbidity, approaches for evaluating post-injury functional status after emergency care are poorly characterized in resource-limited settings. This study evaluated the feasibility of standardized disability assessments among patients presenting with significant trauma to the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali ED in Rwanda from January–June 2020. The functional status at 28-days post-injury was assessed using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2), the Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale, and self-reported functional state. The primary outcome was a descriptive profile of the disability status at 28-days post-injury. The WHODAS 2.0, Katz ADL Scale and patients’ self-perceived functional status was compared using Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient. Twenty-four patients were included. The most common injury mechanism was road traffic accident (70.8%); 58.3% of patients had traumatic brain injury. The self-perception questionnaire and the Katz ADL scale were strongly correlated with the WHODAS 2.0 scale; however, self-perception was not well correlated with the ADL scale. Post-injury morbidity was high and morbidity assessment was feasible, with a strong correlation between patients’ self-perceived functional status and the WHODAS-2 scale. Structured post-injury assessments may serve to inform the development of rehabilitation services in Rwanda, although larger studies are needed to inform such initiatives.

Keywords