PLoS ONE (Jan 2013)

Routine HIV screening in Portugal: clinical impact and cost-effectiveness.

  • Yazdan Yazdanpanah,
  • Julian Perelman,
  • Madeline A DiLorenzo,
  • Joana Alves,
  • Henrique Barros,
  • Céu Mateus,
  • João Pereira,
  • Kamal Mansinho,
  • Marion Robine,
  • Ji-Eun Park,
  • Eric L Ross,
  • Elena Losina,
  • Rochelle P Walensky,
  • Farzad Noubary,
  • Kenneth A Freedberg,
  • A David Paltiel

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084173
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 12
p. e84173

Abstract

Read online

To compare the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of routine HIV screening in Portugal to the current practice of targeted and on-demand screening.We used Portuguese national clinical and economic data to conduct a model-based assessment.We compared current HIV detection practices to strategies of increasingly frequent routine HIV screening in Portuguese adults aged 18-69. We considered several subpopulations and geographic regions with varying levels of undetected HIV prevalence and incidence. Baseline inputs for the national case included undiagnosed HIV prevalence 0.16%, annual incidence 0.03%, mean population age 43 years, mean CD4 count at care initiation 292 cells/μL, 63% HIV test acceptance, 78% linkage to care, and HIV rapid test cost €6 under the proposed routine screening program. Outcomes included quality-adjusted survival, secondary HIV transmission, cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness.One-time national HIV screening increased HIV-infected survival from 164.09 quality-adjusted life months (QALMs) to 166.83 QALMs compared to current practice and had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €28,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Screening more frequently in higher-risk groups was cost-effective: for example screening annually in men who have sex with men or screening every three years in regions with higher incidence and prevalence produced ICERs of €21,000/QALY and €34,000/QALY, respectively.One-time HIV screening in the Portuguese national population will increase survival and is cost-effective by international standards. More frequent screening in higher-risk regions and subpopulations is also justified. Given Portugal's challenging economic priorities, we recommend prioritizing screening in higher-risk populations and geographic settings.