Trials (Mar 2018)

High-flow nasal oxygen vs. standard oxygen therapy in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

  • Elie Azoulay,
  • Virginie Lemiale,
  • Djamel Mokart,
  • Saad Nseir,
  • Laurent Argaud,
  • Frédéric Pène,
  • Loay Kontar,
  • Fabrice Bruneel,
  • Kada Klouche,
  • François Barbier,
  • Jean Reignier,
  • Anabelle Stoclin,
  • Guillaume Louis,
  • Jean-Michel Constantin,
  • Julien Mayaux,
  • Florent Wallet,
  • Achille Kouatchet,
  • Vincent Peigne,
  • Pierre Perez,
  • Christophe Girault,
  • Samir Jaber,
  • Johanna Oziel,
  • Martine Nyunga,
  • Nicolas Terzi,
  • Lila Bouadma,
  • Christine Lebert,
  • Alexandre Lautrette,
  • Naike Bigé,
  • Jean-Herlé Raphalen,
  • Laurent Papazian,
  • Antoine Rabbat,
  • Michael Darmon,
  • Sylvie Chevret,
  • Alexandre Demoule

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2492-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is the leading reason for intensive care unit (ICU) admission in immunocompromised patients. High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy is an alternative to standard oxygen. By providing warmed and humidified gas, HFNO allows the delivery of higher flow rates via nasal cannula devices, with FiO2 values of nearly 100%. Benefits include alleviation of dyspnea and discomfort, decreased respiratory distress and decreased mortality in unselected patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. However, in preliminary reports, HFNO benefits are controversial in immunocompromised patients in whom it has never been properly evaluated. Methods/design This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial in 30 intensive care units, part of the Groupe de Recherche Respiratoire en Réanimation Onco-Hématologique (GRRR-OH). Inclusion criteria will be: (1) adults, (2) known immunosuppression, (3) ARF, (4) oxygen therapy ≥ 6 L/min, (5) written informed consent from patient or proxy. Exclusion criteria will be: (1) imminent death (moribund patient), (2) no informed consent, (3) hypercapnia (PaCO2 ≥ 50 mmHg), (4) isolated cardiogenic pulmonary edema, (5) pregnancy or breastfeeding, (6) anatomical factors precluding insertion of a nasal cannula, (7) no coverage by the French statutory healthcare insurance system, and (8) post-surgical setting from day 1 to day 6 (patients with ARF occurring after day 6 of surgery can be included). The primary outcome measure is day-28 mortality. Secondary outcomes are intubation rate, comfort, dyspnea, respiratory rate, oxygenation, ICU length of stay, and ICU-acquired infections. Based on an expected 30% mortality rate in the standard oxygen group, and 20% in the HFNO group, error rate set at 5%, and a statistical power at 90%, 389 patients are required in each treatment group (778 patients overall). Recruitment period is estimated at 30 months, with 28 days of additional follow-up for the last included patient. Discussion The HIGH study will be the largest multicenter, randomized controlled trial seeking to demonstrate that survival benefits from HFNO reported in unselected patients also apply to a large immunocompromised population. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02739451. Registered on 15 April 2016.

Keywords