PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

In-hospital survival paradox in patients with sleep apnea-A nation-wide nested case-control study.

  • Maurice Moser,
  • Florent Baty,
  • Martin H Brutsche,
  • Otto D Schoch

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271004
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 7
p. e0271004

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundSleep apnea (SA) is a prevalent disorder characterized by recurrent events of nocturnal apnea originating from obstructive and/or central mechanisms. SA disrupts normal sleep and can lead to a series of complications when left untreated. SA results in intermittent hypoxia which has an impact on the cardio- and cerebrovascular system. Hospitalized patients with SA typically have a greater burden of comorbidity, a longer length of hospital stay, but may show an improvement of in-hospital mortality compared to patients without diagnosed SA. The reason for this survival benefit is controversial and we aimed to clarify this protective effect in the light of predictive factors including SA-associated comorbidities using a nation-wide hospitalization database.Methods and findingsData were extracted from a nation-wide hospitalization database provided by the Swiss Federal Office for Statistics. Hospitalized patients with a SA co-diagnosis were extracted from the database together with a 1:1-matched control population without SA. Overall, 212'581 patients with SA were hospitalized in Switzerland between 2002 and 2018. Compared to the controls, SA cases had a longer median length of hospital stay (7 days; 95% CI: 3 to 15 vs. 4 days; 95% CI: 2 to 10) (p ConclusionsCompared to matched controls, SA was associated with significant and relevant inpatient survival benefit in a number of most deadly conditions. Within SA-patients, associated comorbidities mostly correlated with a poorer prognosis, whereas obesity and hypertension were associated with an improved in-hospital mortality.