Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health (Jan 2021)

Cross cultural and global uses of a digital mental health app: results of focus groups with clinicians, patients and family members in India and the United States

  • Elena Rodriguez-Villa,
  • Abhijit R. Rozatkar,
  • Mohit Kumar,
  • Vikram Patel,
  • Ameya Bondre,
  • Shalini S. Naik,
  • Siddharth Dutt,
  • Urvakhsh M. Mehta,
  • Srilakshmi Nagendra,
  • Deepak Tugnawat,
  • Ritu Shrivastava,
  • Harikeerthan Raghuram,
  • Azaz Khan,
  • John A. Naslund,
  • Snehil Gupta,
  • Anant Bhan,
  • Jagadisha Thirthall,
  • Prabhat K. Chand,
  • Tanvi Lakhtakia,
  • Matcheri Keshavan,
  • John Torous

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2021.28
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Despite significant advancements in healthcare technology, digital health solutions – especially those for serious mental illnesses – continue to fall short of their potential across both clinical practice and efficacy. The utility and impact of medicine, including digital medicine, hinges on relationships, trust, and engagement, particularly in the field of mental health. This paper details results from Phase 1 of a two-part study that seeks to engage people with schizophrenia, their family members, and clinicians in co-designing a digital mental health platform for use across different cultures and contexts in the United States and India. Methods Each site interviewed a mix of clinicians, patients, and their family members in focus groups (n = 20) of two to six participants. Open-ended questions and discussions inquired about their own smartphone use and, after a demonstration of the mindLAMP platform, specific feedback on the app's utility, design, and functionality. Results Our results based on thematic analysis indicate three common themes: increased use and interest in technology during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), concerns over how data are used and shared, and a desire for concurrent human interaction to support app engagement. Conclusion People with schizophrenia, their family members, and clinicians are open to integrating technology into treatment to better understand their condition and help inform treatment. However, app engagement is dependent on technology that is complementary – not substitutive – of therapeutic care from a clinician.

Keywords