BMC Oral Health (Dec 2023)

The effect of periapical bone defects on stress distribution in teeth with periapical periodontitis: a finite element analysis

  • ShuoMin Chen,
  • ZhangYan Ye,
  • XinHua Hong,
  • Liang Chen,
  • LinMei Wu,
  • Yilin Wang,
  • YuGe Chen,
  • MengHan Wu,
  • Jun Wang,
  • QinHui Zhang,
  • YuTian Wu,
  • XiaoYu Sun,
  • Xi Ding,
  • ShengBin Huang,
  • ShuFan Zhao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03546-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Apical periodontitis directly affects the stress state of the affected tooth owing to the destruction of the periapical bone. Understanding the mechanical of periapical bone defects/tooth is clinically meaningful. In this study, we evaluate the effect of periapical bone defects on the stress distribution in teeth with periapical periodontitis using finite element analysis. Methods Finite element models of normal mandibular second premolars and those with periapical bone defects (spherical defects with diameters of 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm) were created using a digital model design software. The edges of the mandible were fixed and the masticatory cycle was simplified as oblique loading (a 400 N force loaded obliquely at 45° to the long axis of the tooth body) to simulate the tooth stress state in occlusion and analyze the von Mises stress distribution and tooth displacement distribution in each model. Results Overall analysis of the models: Compared to that in the normal model, the maximum von Mises stresses in all the different periapical bone defect size models were slightly lower. In contrast, the maximum tooth displacement in the periapical bone defect model increased as the size of the periapical bone defect increased (2.11–120.1% of increase). Internal analysis of tooth: As the size of the periapical bone defect increased, the maximum von Mises stress in the coronal cervix of the tooth gradually increased (2.23–37.22% of increase). while the von Mises stress in the root apical region of the tooth showed a decreasing trend (41.48–99.70% of decrease). The maximum tooth displacement in all parts of the tooth showed an increasing trend as the size of the periapical bone defect increased. Conclusions The presence of periapical bone defects was found to significantly affect the biomechanical response of the tooth, the effects of which became more pronounced as the size of the bone defect increased.

Keywords