Applied Sciences (Oct 2021)

Shaking Table Tests to Validate Inelastic Seismic Analysis Method Applicable to Nuclear Metal Components

  • Gyeong-Hoi Koo,
  • Sang-Won Ahn,
  • Jong-Keun Hwang,
  • Jong-Sung Kim

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199264
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 19
p. 9264

Abstract

Read online

The main purpose of this study is to perform shaking table tests to validate the inelastic seismic analysis method applicable to pressure-retaining metal components in nuclear power plants (NPPs). To do this, the test mockup was designed and fabricated to be able to describe the hot leg surge line nozzle with a piping system, which is known to be one of the seismically fragile components in nuclear steam supply systems (NSSS). The used input motions are the displacement time histories corresponding to the design floor response spectrum at an elevation of 136 ft in the in-structure building in NPPs. Two earthquake levels are used in this study. One is the design-basis safe shutdown earthquake level (SSE, PGA = 0.3 g) and the other is the beyond-design-basis earthquake level (BDBE, PGA = 0.6 g), which is linearly scaled from the SSE level. To measure the inelastic strain responses, five strain gauges were attached at the expected critical locations in the target nozzle, and three accelerometers were installed at the shaking table and piping system to measure the dynamic responses. From the results of the shaking table tests, it was found that the plastic strain response at the target nozzle and the acceleration response at the piping system were not amplified by as much as two times the input earthquake level because the plastic behavior in the piping system significantly contributed to energy dissipation during the seismic events. To simulate the test results, elastoplastic seismic analyses with the well-known Chaboche kinematic hardening model and the Voce isotropic hardening model for Type 316 stainless steel were carried out, and the results of the principal strain and the acceleration responses were compared with the test results. From the comparison, it was found that the inelastic seismic analysis method can give very reasonable results when the earthquake level is large enough to invoke plastic behavior in nuclear metal components.

Keywords