Journal of Personalized Medicine (May 2023)

Development of Predictive Models for the Response of Vestibular Schwannoma Treated with Cyberknife<sup>®</sup>: A Feasibility Study Based on Radiomics and Machine Learning

  • Isa Bossi Zanetti,
  • Elena De Martin,
  • Riccardo Pascuzzo,
  • Natascha Claudia D’Amico,
  • Sara Morlino,
  • Irene Cane,
  • Domenico Aquino,
  • Marco Alì,
  • Michaela Cellina,
  • Giancarlo Beltramo,
  • Laura Fariselli

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050808
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 5
p. 808

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: to predict vestibular schwannoma (VS) response to radiosurgery by applying machine learning (ML) algorithms on radiomic features extracted from pre-treatment magnetic resonance (MR) images. Methods: patients with VS treated with radiosurgery in two Centers from 2004 to 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Brain T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR images were acquired before and at 24 and 36 months after treatment. Clinical and treatment data were collected contextually. Treatment responses were assessed considering the VS volume variation based on pre- and post-radiosurgery MR images at both time points. Tumors were semi-automatically segmented and radiomic features were extracted. Four ML algorithms (Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Neural Network, and extreme Gradient Boosting) were trained and tested for treatment response (i.e., increased or non-increased tumor volume) using nested cross-validation. For training, feature selection was performed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, and the selected features were used as input to separately build the four ML classification algorithms. To overcome class imbalance during training, Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique was used. Finally, trained models were tested on the corresponding held out set of patients to evaluate balanced accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: 108 patients treated with Cyberknife® were retrieved; an increased tumor volume was observed at 24 months in 12 patients, and at 36 months in another group of 12 patients. The Neural Network was the best predictive algorithm for response at 24 (balanced accuracy 73% ± 18%, specificity 85% ± 12%, sensitivity 60% ± 42%) and 36 months (balanced accuracy 65% ± 12%, specificity 83% ± 9%, sensitivity 47% ± 27%). Conclusions: radiomics may predict VS response to radiosurgery avoiding long-term follow-up as well as unnecessary treatment.

Keywords