PLoS ONE (Jan 2012)

Improved outcome prediction using CT angiography in addition to standard ischemic stroke assessment: results from the STOPStroke study.

  • R Gilberto González,
  • Michael H Lev,
  • Gregory V Goldmacher,
  • Wade S Smith,
  • Seyedmehdi Payabvash,
  • Gordon J Harris,
  • Elkan F Halpern,
  • Walter J Koroshetz,
  • Erica C S Camargo,
  • William P Dillon,
  • Karen L Furie

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030352
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 1
p. e30352

Abstract

Read online

To improve ischemic stroke outcome prediction using imaging information from a prospective cohort who received admission CT angiography (CTA).In a prospectively designed study, 649 stroke patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke had admission NIH stroke scale scores, noncontrast CT (NCCT), CTA, and 6-month outcome assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores. Poor outcome was defined as mRS>2. Strokes were classified as "major" by the (1) Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS+) if NCCT ASPECTS was ≤7; (2) Boston Acute Stroke Imaging Scale (BASIS+) if they were ASPECTS+ or CTA showed occlusion of the distal internal carotid, proximal middle cerebral, or basilar arteries; and (3) NIHSS for scores >10.Of 649 patients, 253 (39.0%) had poor outcomes. NIHSS, BASIS, and age, but not ASPECTS, were independent predictors of outcome. BASIS and NIHSS had similar sensitivities, both superior to ASPECTS (p10/BASIS+ had poor outcomes, versus 21.5% (77/358) with NIHSS≤10/BASIS- (p10/BASIS+ compared to patients who are NIHSS≤10/BASIS-; the odds ratio is 5.4 (95% CI: 3.5 to 8.5) when compared to patients who are only NIHSS>10 or BASIS+.BASIS and NIHSS are independent outcome predictors. Their combination is stronger than either instrument alone in predicting outcomes. The findings suggest that CTA is a significant clinical tool in routine acute stroke assessment.