Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health (Jun 2024)

Exploring the Impact of 3D Fast Spin Echo and Inversion Recovery Gradient Echo Sequences Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition on Automated Brain Tumor Segmentation

  • Mana Moassefi, MD,
  • Shahriar Faghani, MD,
  • Sara Khanipour Roshan, MD,
  • Gian Marco Conte, MD, PhD,
  • Seyed Moein Rassoulinejad Mousavi, MD,
  • Timothy J. Kaufmann, MD,
  • Bradley J. Erickson, MD, PhD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 2
pp. 231 – 240

Abstract

Read online

Objective: To conduct a study comparing the performance of automated segmentation techniques using 2 different contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CET1) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition protocol. Patients and Methods: We collected 100 preoperative glioblastoma (GBM) MRIs consisting of 50 IR-GRE and 50 3-dimensional fast spin echo (3D-FSE) image sets. Their gold-standard tumor segmentation mask was created based on the expert opinion of a neuroradiologist. Cases were randomly divided into training and test sets. We used the no new UNet (nnUNet) architecture pretrained on the 501-image public data set containing IR-GRE sequence image sets, followed by 2 training rounds with the IR-GRE and 3D-FSE images, respectively. For each patient, in the IR-GRE and 3D-FSE test sets, we had 2 prediction masks, one from the model fine-tuned with the IR-GRE training set and one with 3D-FSE. The dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of the 2 sets of results for each case in the test sets were compared using the Wilcoxon tests. Results: Models trained on 3D-FSE images outperformed IR-GRE models in lesion segmentation, with mean DSC differences of 0.057 and 0.022 in the respective test sets. For the 3D-FSE and IR-GRE test sets, the calculated P values comparing DSCs from 2 models were .02 and .61, respectively. Conclusion: Including 3D-FSE MRI in the training data set improves segmentation performance when segmenting 3D-FSE images.