Ethical challenges from a problem-solving intervention with workplace involvement: a qualitative study among employees with common mental disorders, first-line managers, and rehabilitation coordinators

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore ethical challenges potentially arising from a problem-solving intervention with workplace involvement (PSI-WPI) in primary health care (with first-line manager involvement) for employees on sickness absence due to common mental disorders. Methods A qualitative design guided by the theoretical framework for systematic identification of ethical aspects of healthcare technologies. Semi-structured interviews were performed with coordinators (n = 6), employees (n = 13), and first-line managers (n = 8). Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse and interpret themes. Results A main theme was identified “the workplace and healthcare hold different organizational value logics” and four sub-themes: “the PSI-WPI challenged the organizational goals and values of the workplace and healthcare”, “the PSI-WPI challenged organizational values on fairness”, “the PSI-WPI challenged the professional roles of first-line managers and rehabilitation coordinators” and “the PSI-WPI introduced a need for the employee to juggle the employee and patient roles”. Conclusion Different organizational value logics, values, and goals can introduce ethical challenges. We advise clarifying stakeholders’ roles and preparing employees and managers for the return to work process by providing sufficient information. The ethical challenges and suggested measures to minimize them, should be considered when planning return to work interventions that involve several stakeholders.

Keywords

• problem-solving
• sickness absence
• common mental disorders
• depression
• anxiety
• adjustment disorder
• ethical challenges
• work-directed interventions