PLoS Medicine (Feb 2024)

Comparison of 3 optimized delivery strategies for completion of isoniazid-rifapentine (3HP) for tuberculosis prevention among people living with HIV in Uganda: A single-center randomized trial.

  • Fred C Semitala,
  • Jillian L Kadota,
  • Allan Musinguzi,
  • Fred Welishe,
  • Anne Nakitende,
  • Lydia Akello,
  • Lynn Kunihira Tinka,
  • Jane Nakimuli,
  • Joan Ritar Kasidi,
  • Opira Bishop,
  • Suzan Nakasendwa,
  • Yeonsoo Baik,
  • Devika Patel,
  • Amanda Sammann,
  • Payam Nahid,
  • Robert Belknap,
  • Moses R Kamya,
  • Margaret A Handley,
  • Patrick Pj Phillips,
  • Anne Katahoire,
  • Christopher A Berger,
  • Noah Kiwanuka,
  • Achilles Katamba,
  • David W Dowdy,
  • Adithya Cattamanchi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004356
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 2
p. e1004356

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundExpanding access to shorter regimens for tuberculosis (TB) prevention, such as once-weekly isoniazid and rifapentine taken for 3 months (3HP), is critical for reducing global TB burden among people living with HIV (PLHIV). Our coprimary hypotheses were that high levels of acceptance and completion of 3HP could be achieved with delivery strategies optimized to overcome well-contextualized barriers and that 3HP acceptance and completion would be highest when PLHIV were provided an informed choice between delivery strategies.Methods and findingsIn a pragmatic, single-center, 3-arm, parallel-group randomized trial, PLHIV receiving care at a large urban HIV clinic in Kampala, Uganda, were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 3HP by facilitated directly observed therapy (DOT), facilitated self-administered therapy (SAT), or informed choice between facilitated DOT and facilitated SAT using a shared decision-making aid. We assessed the primary outcome of acceptance and completion (≥11 of 12 doses of 3HP) within 16 weeks of treatment initiation using proportions with exact binomial confidence intervals (CIs). We compared proportions between arms using Fisher's exact test (two-sided α = 0.025). Trial investigators were blinded to primary and secondary outcomes by study arm. Between July 13, 2020, and July 8, 2022, 1,656 PLHIV underwent randomization, with equal numbers allocated to each study arm. One participant was erroneously enrolled a second time and was excluded in the primary intention-to-treat analysis. Among the remaining 1,655 participants, the proportion who accepted and completed 3HP exceeded the prespecified 80% target in the DOT (0.94; 97.5% CI [0.91, 0.96] p ConclusionsShort-course TB preventive treatment was widely accepted by PLHIV in Uganda, and very high levels of treatment completion were achieved in a programmatic setting with delivery strategies tailored to address known barriers.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03934931.