Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology (Nov 2021)

Abstract 1122‐000128: Imaging Follow‐Up in Carotid Webs: Is There Vascular Remodeling?

  • Sitara Koneru,
  • Raul G Nogueira,
  • David Landzberg,
  • Ehizele Osehobo,
  • Qasem AlShaer,
  • Alhamza R Al‐Bayati,
  • Fadi Nahab,
  • Diogo C Haussen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.01.suppl_1.000128
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 1, no. S1

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Carotid web (CaW) is a shelf‐like fibrotic projection at the carotid bulb and constitutes an underrecognized cause of ischemic stroke. Atherosclerotic lesions are known to have dynamic remodeling with time however, little is known regarding the evolution of CaW over time. We aimed to better understand if CaW is a static or dynamic entity on delayed vascular imaging. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the CaW database at our comprehensive stroke center, including patients diagnosed with CaW between September 2014 through June 2021. Patients who had at least two good quality CT angiograms (CTAs) that were at least 6 months apart were included (CTAs with CaW and superimposed thrombus were excluded). CaW were quantified with 3‐D measurements using Horos software. This was done via volumetric analysis of free‐hand delineated CaW borders on thin cuts of axial CTA (Figure 1 Panel A). NASCET criteria was used to evaluate the degree of stenosis. Results: Sixteen CaW in 13 patients were identified and included. The median imaging follow‐up window was 16 months (IQR 12–22, range 6–29). Median patient age was 45.5 years‐old, 69% were women, 25% had hypertension, 38% hyperlipidemia, 25% diabetes mellitus, 0% atrial fibrillation, and 13% active smokers. 75% of the included CaW were symptomatic while 25% were asymptomatic. Median volume of CaW on initial CTA (8.52 mm3 [IQR 3.7‐13], range 2.2‐30.4) was comparable to median volume of CaW on most recent CTA (8.47 mm3 [IQR 4.0‐12.8], range 2.3‐29.4; p = <0.001 (Figure 1 Panel B). The CaW volumetric measurement correlation between the initial and most recent CTA was near perfect (rs = ‐0.99, p = <0.001). The median change in measured volume of CaW between first and last CTA was ‐0.19 mm3 [IQR ‐0.6‐0.4], range ‐1‐0.8. Median degree of stenosis was 8.1% [IQR 4.5‐17.1], range 0.4‐31.2. The duration of follow‐up imaging was not correlated with the change in CaW volume (Kendall tau‐b[τb] = ‐0.17, p = 0.93). The initial CaW volume was not found to be correlated to the degree of stenosis (τb = ‐0.08, p = 0.65). Conclusions: The volume of the CaW was not found to change over time, reinforcing the idea that this is a relatively static lesion. The CaW volume was not found to correlate with the degree of stenosis caused by it. Further longitudinal studies with longer follow‐up intervals are warranted.

Keywords