Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity (Jun 2020)

Optimal Cut-Offs of Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference to Identify Obesity in Chinese Type 2 Diabetic Patients

  • Zhao Q,
  • Chen X,
  • Wu J,
  • Gong L,
  • Hu J,
  • Yang S,
  • Li Q,
  • Wang Z

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 13
pp. 1899 – 1909

Abstract

Read online

Qinying Zhao,* Xiangjun Chen,* Jinshan Wu, Lilin Gong, Jinbo Hu, Shumin Yang, Qifu Li, Zhihong Wang Department of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Zhihong WangDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/ Fax +86 023 89011552Email [email protected]: The prevalence of general obesity (commonly defined by body mass index (BMI) in kg/m2) and abdominal obesity (commonly assessed by waist circumference (WC)) has increased rapidly in China. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of traditional cut-offs for BMI or WC to identify general or abdominal obesity in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients and propose optimal cut-offs.Patients and Methods: BMI and WC were obtained from 1539 type 2 diabetic patients. Body fat percentage and visceral fat area measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry were set as the gold standard to identify general and abdominal obesity. We assessed the diagnostic power of traditional cut-offs for BMI and WC to define obesity, and analyzed receive operating characteristic (ROC) curves to obtain the optimal cut-offs to identify obesity in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients.Results: In Chinese type 2 diabetic patients, the optimal BMI was 25 kg/m2 with the best trade-off between sensitivity and specificity (men: 74.6% (95% CI: 70.7– 78.2%) and 65.1% (95% CI: 59.7– 70.3%), AUC 0.78 (95% CI: 0.75– 0.81), p< 0.05; women: 65.8% (95% CI: 60.3– 71.0%) and 80.3% (95% CI: 75.7– 84.3%), AUC 0.80 (95% CI: 0.77– 0.83), p< 0.05) in both genders. The optimal WC was 93 cm in men and 90 cm in women with the best trade-off between sensitivity and specificity (men: 87.2% (95% CI: 84.3– 89.8%) and 80.2% (95% CI: 74.9– 84.8%), AUC 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88– 0.92), p< 0.05; women: 81.0% (95% CI: 76.9– 84.6%) and 88.7% (95% CI: 83.9– 92.4%), AUC 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90– 0.94), p< 0.05).Conclusion: For the Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes, the optimal cut-offs for BMI or WC to identify general or abdominal obesity need to be reconsidered.Keywords: diagnostic test, type 2 diabetes, body mass index, waist circumference, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Keywords