Outcomes of melphalan 140 mg/m2 followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients with co‐morbidities: Single‐centre experience
Dario Melotti,
Samir Asher,
Ethan Troy‐Barnes,
George Nesr,
William Wilson,
Marquita Camilleri,
Rakesh Popat,
Ke Xu,
Neil Rabin,
Jonathan Sive,
Xenofon Papanikolaou,
Lydia Lee,
Annabel McMillan,
Kwee Yong,
Chara Kyriakou
Affiliations
Dario Melotti
Haematology University College Hospital London UK
Samir Asher
Haematology University College Hospital London UK
Ethan Troy‐Barnes
Department of Haematology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
George Nesr
Clinical Haematology Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UK
William Wilson
CRUK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre University College London London UK
Marquita Camilleri
Haematology Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre Bristol UK
Rakesh Popat
Haematology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Ke Xu
Haematology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Neil Rabin
Haematology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Jonathan Sive
Department of Haematology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Xenofon Papanikolaou
Haematology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Lydia Lee
Department of Haematology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Annabel McMillan
Department of Haematology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Kwee Yong
Haematology University College Hospital London UK
Chara Kyriakou
Haematology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Abstract High‐dose melphalan followed by stem cell rescue is the standard consolidative therapy for transplant‐eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in the United Kingdom. A melphalan dose of 200 mg/m2 (Mel200) is considered the “gold standard” for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) conditioning for fit patients ≤70 years old; however, with a peak diagnosis incidence at 80–89 years old in the UK dose adjustments will be inevitable to limit toxicities. In this single‐centre UK‐based retrospective analysis, data was collected from patients with plasma cell dyscrasias who underwent a first reduced‐intensity, Mel140, ASCT from 2006 to 2019, a total of 81 patients. We found that the procedure was overall safe with seven (9%) of patients requiring ITU admission and a single transplant‐related death within the initial autograft admission. The progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival were comparable with those previously reported in the literature with median PFS for our cohort of 31 months. Univariate analysis of our data showed an inferior PFS for patients aged ≥70 years. In conclusion, although this is a retrospective analysis, it demonstrates that dose‐reduced melphalan conditioning is safe and effective in patients deemed unfit for standard‐intensity conditioning.