Majallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Bābul (Mar 2023)
Presenting a Model Regarding the Effect of Ethical Sensitivity and Its Associated Components on the Quality of Research among Academic Personnel
Abstract
Background and Objective: Ethical sensitivity is one of the criteria regarding the professional competence of researchers, which affects the ethical performance of the researcher. Since compliance with the principles and rules of ethics is an effective factor in providing high quality research results, the present study was conducted to investigate the ethical sensitivity and its associated components on the quality of research among academic personnel of universities of medical sciences in metropolitan area No. 1 in Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 320 academic personnel of universities of medical sciences in metropolitan area No. 1 (Guilan, Mazandaran, Golestan, Babol, Shahrud, and Semnan) who were selected by stratified random sampling. Data were collected using ethical sensitivity and research quality questionnaires. The ethical sensitivity questionnaire includes 50 questions and two dimensions of "functional and individual", each of which includes 4 fields. The researcher-made questionnaire of research quality includes 31 questions and 4 fields. The questionnaires were rated from 1 to 5 according to Likert scale. Ethical sensitivity was compared between researchers based on work experience, academic degree and gender. Then, the effect of each component of ethical sensitivity on the quality of the research was evaluated. Findings: Out of 320 studied samples, 223 were male (69.7%) and 97 were female (30.3%). In people with experience of less than 10 years, the mean score of honesty was 15.74±3.21, ethical behavior was 30.50±5.74, accountability was 33.81±5.64, decision-making was 23.62±4.28, and interpersonal communication was 18.66±3.56, indicating higher values compared to people with an experience of more than 10 years (p<0.01). Among the dimensions of ethical sensitivity, the dimensions of honesty and discipline showed positive and significant effects on the quality of research. However, the effect of respect for the client, ethical behavior, professional knowledge, accountability, decision-making and interpersonal communication was not statistically significant despite the effect on the quality of the research. Discipline had the greatest effect on research quality (β=0.293). The R2 value (0.489) shows that about 49% of the variance of the research quality score is explained by the dimensions of ethical sensitivity. Ethical sensitivity with a standard coefficient of 7.758 had an effect on the quality of research. Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that ethical sensitivity, especially the dimensions of honesty and discipline, has an effect on the quality of research.
