Cellular Response of Human Osteoblasts to Different Presentations of Deproteinized Bovine Bone
Pedro Henrique de Azambuja Carvalho,
Sarah Al-Maawi,
Eva Dohle,
Robert Alexander Sader,
Valfrido Antonio Pereira-Filho,
Shahram Ghanaati
Affiliations
Pedro Henrique de Azambuja Carvalho
Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry, Sao Paulo State University (Unesp), Araraquara 14801-060, Brazil
Sarah Al-Maawi
FORM-Lab, Frankfurt Oral Regenerative Medicine, Department for Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Medical Center of the Goethe University, 60323 Frankfurt, Germany
Eva Dohle
FORM-Lab, Frankfurt Oral Regenerative Medicine, Department for Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Medical Center of the Goethe University, 60323 Frankfurt, Germany
Robert Alexander Sader
FORM-Lab, Frankfurt Oral Regenerative Medicine, Department for Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Medical Center of the Goethe University, 60323 Frankfurt, Germany
Valfrido Antonio Pereira-Filho
Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry, Sao Paulo State University (Unesp), Araraquara 14801-060, Brazil
Shahram Ghanaati
FORM-Lab, Frankfurt Oral Regenerative Medicine, Department for Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Medical Center of the Goethe University, 60323 Frankfurt, Germany
Objectives: This study evaluated the cellular response of primary osteoblasts exposed to two different presentations of a low-temperature non-sintered deproteinized bovine bone matrix (DBBM). Materials and methods: Six different baths of a commercially available DBBM block (Bonefill® Porous Block) and one of DBBM granule (Bonefill® Porous) were evaluated to identify the mineral structure and organic or cellular remnants. Samples of the same baths were processed in TRIZOL for RNA extraction and quantification. For the immunologic cell reaction assay, primary human osteoblasts (pOB) were exposed to DBMM block (pOB + B) or granules (pOB + G), or none (control) for 1, 3, or 7 days of cell cultivation. Expression of proinflammatory cytokines by pOB was evaluated by crosslinked ELISA assay. In addition, total DNA amount, as well as cell viability via LDH evaluation, was assessed. Results: Organic remnants were present in DBBM blocks; 45.55% (±7.12) of osteocytes lacunae presented cellular remnants in blocks compared to 17.31% (±1.31) in granules. In three of five batches of blocks, it was possible to isolate bovine RNA. The highest concentration of TGF-β1 was found in supernatants of pOB + G on day 7 (218.85 ± 234.62 pg/mL) (p p p Conclusion: Neither tested material induced a pronounced inflammatory response upon osteoblast cultivation. However, further studies are needed to elucidate the potential influence of organic remnants in bone substitute materials on the regeneration process.