BMJ Open Respiratory Research (Feb 2022)

Changes in interpretation of spirometry by implementing the GLI 2012 reference equations: impact on patients tested in a hospital-based PFT lab in a large metropolitan city

  • Clodagh M Ryan,
  • Haruna Kitazawa,
  • Annie Jiang,
  • Cynthia Nohra,
  • Honami Ota

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001389
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Background The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI-2012) focused on race/ethnicity as an important factor in determining reference values. This study evaluated the effects of changing from Canadian reference equations developed from an all-Caucasian cohort with European ancestry to the GLI-2012 on the interpretation of spirometry in a multiethnic population and aimed to identify the ethnic groups affected by discrepant interpretations.Methods Clinically indicated spirometry in a multiethnic population (aged 20–80 years) collected from 2018 to 2021 was analysed. The predicted and lower limit of normal (LLN) values were calculated using three sets of reference equations: Canadian, GLI-race/ethnic-based (GLI-Race) and GLI-race/ethnic-neutral (GLI-Other). We compared the prevalence of concordance in the abnormal diagnoses (defined as <LLN) for forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC among the three reference values, and evaluated whether race/ethnicity was associated with discordance.Results Data from 406 participants were evaluated (non-Caucasian 43.6%). There was 85%–87% concordance for normal/abnormal FVC and FEV1 interpretations among the Canadian, GLI-Race and GLI-Other reference equations. In all ethnic groups, application of the Canadian references for interpretation led to a higher prevalence of abnormal (<LLN) FVC and FEV1compared with GLI-Race and GLI-Other. This trend was more prominent in Black, South-East Asian and Mixed/other ethnic groups when comparing the Canadian to the GLI-Race equations. In contrast, the discordance rates were similar among ethnic groups when compared with the GLI-Other reference equations. Interpretation of FEV1/FVC had a high rate of agreement among all equations.Conclusion Interpretation using Canadian reference equations was associated with a higher prevalence of restrictive physiology compared with the GLI-2012 equations, particularly if the GLI-Race were used. These observations were mostly found in non-white Caucasian groups, highlighting the need to choose reference equations that reflect closely the ethnic mix of the population being evaluated in order to optimise patient management.