Biology (Jul 2024)

Early Peri-Implant Bone Healing on Laser-Modified Surfaces with and without Hydroxyapatite Coating: An In Vivo Study

  • Ana Flávia Piquera Santos,
  • Rodrigo Capalbo da Silva,
  • Henrique Hadad,
  • Laís Kawamata de Jesus,
  • Maísa Pereira-Silva,
  • Heloisa Helena Nímia,
  • Sandra Helena Penha Oliveira,
  • Antônio Carlos Guastaldi,
  • Thallita Pereira Queiroz,
  • Pier Paolo Poli,
  • Debora de Barros Barbosa,
  • André Luis da Silva Fabris,
  • Idelmo Rangel Garcia Júnior,
  • Reinhard Gruber,
  • Francisley Ávila Souza

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13070533
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 7
p. 533

Abstract

Read online

(1) Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the biological behavior of bone tissue on a machined surface (MS) and modifications made by a laser beam (LS) and by a laser beam incorporated with hydroxyapatite (HA) using a biomimetic method without thermic treatment (LHS). (2) Methods: Scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/EDX) was performed before and after installation in the rabbit tibiae. A total of 20 Albinus rabbits randomly received 30 implants of 3.75 × 10 mm in the right and left tibias, with two implants on each surface in each tibia. In the animals belonging to the 4-week euthanasia period group, intramuscular application of the fluorochromes calcein and alizarin was performed. In implants placed mesially in the tibiofemoral joint, biomechanical analysis was performed by means of a removal torque (N/cm). The tibias with the implants located distally to the joint were submitted for analysis by confocal laser microscopy (mineral apposition rate) and for histometric analysis by bone contact implant (%BIC) and newly formed bone area (%NBA). (3) Results: The SEM showed differences between the surfaces. The biomechanical analysis revealed significant differences in removal torque values between the MSs and LHSs over a 2-week period. Over a 4-week period, both the LSs and LHSs demonstrated removal torque values statistically higher than the MSs. BIC of the LHS implants were statistically superior to MS at the 2-week period and LHS and LS surfaces were statistically superior to MS at the 4-week period. Statistical analysis of the NBA of the implants showed difference between the LHS and MS in the period of 2 weeks. (4) Conclusions: The modifications of the LSs and LHSs provided important physicochemical modifications that favored the deposition of bone tissue on the surface of the implants.

Keywords