Tobacco Induced Diseases (Jun 2024)

The inclusion of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products in smoke-free home and car rules: A cross-sectional survey of adults in Armenia and Georgia

  • Varduhi Hayrumyan,
  • Zhanna Sargsyan,
  • Arevik Torosyan,
  • Ana Dekanosidze,
  • Lilit Grigoryan,
  • Nour Alayan,
  • Michelle C. Kegler,
  • Lela Sturua,
  • Varduhi Petrosyan,
  • Alexander Bazarchyan,
  • Regine Haardörfer,
  • Yuxian Cui,
  • Carla J. Berg

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/189200
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22, no. June
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Introduction Understanding who includes e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products (HTPs) in smoke-free home or car rules could inform public health interventions, particularly in countries with high smoking prevalence and recently implemented national smoke-free laws, like Armenia and Georgia. Methods In 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among 1468 adults in 28 Armenian and Georgian communities (mean age=42.92 years; 51.4% female, 31.6% past-month smoking). Multilevel regression (accounting for clustering within communities; adjusted for sociodemographics and cigarette use) examined e-cigarette/HTP perceptions (risk, social acceptability) and use intentions in relation to: 1) including e-cigarettes/HTPs in home and car rules among participants with home and car rules, respectively (logistic regressions); and 2) intention to include e-cigarettes/HTPs in home rules (linear regression, 1 = ‘not at all’ to 7 = ‘extremely’) among those without home rules. Results Overall, 72.9% (n=1070) had home rules, 86.5% of whom included e-cigarettes/HTPs; 33.9% (n=498) had car rules, 81.3% of whom included e-cigarettes/HTPs. Greater perceived e-cigarette/HTP risk was associated with including e-cigarettes/HTPs in home rules (AOR=1.28; 95% CI: 1.08–1.50) and car rules (AOR=1.46; 95% CI: 1.14–1.87) and next-year intentions to include e-cigarettes/HTPs in home rules (β=0.38; 95% CI: 0.25–0.50). Lower e-cigarette/ HTP use intentions were associated with including e-cigarettes/HTPs in home rules (AOR=0.75; 95% CI: 0.63–0.88). While perceived social acceptability was unassociated with the outcomes, other social influences were: having children and no other household smokers was associated with including e-cigarettes/HTPs in car rules, and having children was associated with intent to include e-cigarettes/ HTPs in home rules. Conclusions Interventions to address gaps in home and car rules might target e-cigarette/HTP risk perceptions.

Keywords