PLoS ONE (Jan 2018)

Diagnostic performance of blood inflammatory markers for tuberculosis screening in people living with HIV.

  • Katherine Farr,
  • Resmi Ravindran,
  • Luke Strnad,
  • Emily Chang,
  • Lelia H Chaisson,
  • Christina Yoon,
  • William Worodria,
  • Alfred Andama,
  • Irene Ayakaka,
  • Priscilla Bbosa Nalwanga,
  • Patrick Byanyima,
  • Nelson Kalema,
  • Sylvia Kaswabuli,
  • Winceslaus Katagira,
  • Kyomugisha Denise Aman,
  • Emmanuel Musisi,
  • Nuwagaba Wallen Tumwine,
  • Ingvar Sanyu,
  • Robert Ssebunya,
  • J Lucian Davis,
  • Laurence Huang,
  • Imran H Khan,
  • Adithya Cattamanchi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206119
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 10
p. e0206119

Abstract

Read online

BACKGROUND:Approaches to screening for active tuberculosis (TB) among people living with HIV are inadequate, leading to missed diagnoses and poor implementation of preventive therapy. METHODS:Consecutive HIV-infected adults hospitalized at Mulago Hospital (Kampala, Uganda) between June 2011 and July 2013 with a cough ≥ 2 weeks were enrolled. Patients underwent extensive evaluation for pulmonary TB. Concentrations of 43 cytokines/chemokines were measured at the same time point as C-reactive protein (CRP) in banked plasma samples using commercially-available multiplex kits. Advanced classification algorithms were used to rank cytokines/chemokines for their ability to identify TB, and to model the specificity of the top-ranked cytokines/chemokines individually and in combination with sensitivity constrained to ≥ 90% as recommended for TB screening. RESULTS:The median plasma level of 5 biomarkers (IL-6, INF-γ, MIG, CRP, IL-18) was significantly different between patients with and without TB. With sensitivity constrained to 90%, all had low specificity with IL-6 showing the highest specificity (44%; 95% CI 37.4-49.5). Biomarker panels were found to be more valuable than any biomarker alone. A panel combining IFN-γ and IL-6 had the highest specificity (50%; 95% CI 46.7-53.3). Sensitivity remained high (>85%) for all panels among sputum smear-negative TB patients. CONCLUSIONS:Direct measurement of unstimulated plasma cytokines/chemokines in peripheral blood is a promising approach to TB screening. Cytokine/chemokine panels retained high sensitivity for smear-negative TB and achieved improved specificity compared to individual cytokines/chemokines. These markers should be further evaluated in outpatient settings where most TB screening occurs and where other illnesses associated with systematic inflammation are less common.