Meteorological Applications (Mar 2021)

Possible influence of the convection schemes in regional climate model RegCM4.6 for climate services over Central Africa

  • A. J. Komkoua Mbienda,
  • G. M. Guenang,
  • R. S. Tanessong,
  • S. V. Ashu Ngono,
  • S. Zebaze,
  • D. A. Vondou

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1980
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 28, no. 2
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract In this study we evaluate the reliability of the Regional Climate Model (RegCM4.6) by performing several sensitivity tests at 50 km horizontal resolution using 10 convection schemes or combination of convection schemes. Emphasis on model output is made for the September–October–November 2017–2019 seasonal period. Part of the Central African region, five sub‐regions, was identified. The simulated temperatures are compared to the daily climatology of near‐surface temperature of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis fifth‐generation and the National Center for Environmental Prediction datasets, while the simulated precipitations are compared to the precipitation of the Global Precipitation Climatology Project and Climate Hazards Group Infrared Precipitation with Stations datasets. In most analyses, the Grell scheme with Arakawa–Schubert closure assumption tends to have the best index of agreement but its spatial distribution shows underestimation of rainfall. Generally, the Emanuel convection scheme is more suitable to represent rainfall and temperature over Central Africa. Compared to our previous study (Komkoua Mbienda et al., International Journal of Climatology, 2017, 37, 328–342), the present study shows that we have to pay attention to the choice of convective scheme when using any version of RegCM4 released for climate study over Central Africa. This choice is strictly related to the RegCM version released, the study years and the season. It is important to note, however, that the results presented are a preliminary study of the response to the selected convection schemes. The analysis uses a limited sample of climate model simulation (three model years for each convection scheme). Follow‐up work, featuring longer duration climate simulations and a full assessment of statistical significance, is therefore required to confirm the robustness of the analysis presented.

Keywords