Comparative analysis between the safety and efficacy of oral corticosteroids versus corticosteroids pulse therapies in IgA nephropathy

Abstract

Objective This study retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of oral corticosteroid therapy (OCT) and corticosteroid pulse therapy (CPT) in the treatment of IgA nephropathy.Methods One ninety-two patients were diagnosed with IgA nephropathy and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate > 15mL/min/1.73m2 and 24-h urine protein level of 0.75-3.5g. Patients were divided into CPT and OCT groups according to the treatment protocol. The differences in the efficacy and safety between the two groups were assessed by logistic regression analysis and propensity score matching.Results Significant differences at baseline, including 24-h urine protein level and eGFR, were observed between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the remission rate increased significantly, while the incidences of total adverse events and infections decreased in CPT group compared with the OCT group after adjusting the potential confounding factors. Forty-seven pairs of subjects are matched by using propensity score matching with similar baseline data. The results indicate that the total remission rate and complete remission rate were significantly higher, while the incidences of total adverse events were lower (p = 0.008) in the CPT group than in the OCT group. The subgroup analysis showed that CPT group was more likely to achieve remission in patients with initial 24-h urine protein levels falling into the range of 2–3.5 g and Oxford Classification of S1 or C1/2 (p < 0.05).Conclusion Among patients with IgA nephropathy and 24-h urine protein levels of 0.75–3.5g, CPT may be more effective than OCT in reducing urinary protein levels and improving renal function with a lower incidence of adverse events.

Keywords

• IgA nephropathy
• corticosteroids
• pulse therapy
• efficacy