Bioengineering (Jun 2022)

Estimation of Aortic Stiffness with Bramwell–Hill Equation: A Comparative Analysis with Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity

  • Luca Mesin,
  • Luca Floris,
  • Piero Policastro,
  • Stefano Albani,
  • Paolo Scacciatella,
  • Nicola Pugliese,
  • Stefano Masi,
  • Andrea Grillo,
  • Bruno Fabris,
  • Francesco Antonini-Canterin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9070265
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 7
p. 265

Abstract

Read online

Aortic stiffness is an important clinical parameter for predicting cardiovascular events. Carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) has been proposed for performing this evaluation non-invasively; however, it requires dedicated equipment and experienced operators. We explored the possibility of measuring aortic stiffness using ultrasound scans of the abdominal aorta coupled with the Bramwell–Hill equation. Healthy subjects were investigated; measurements of cf-PWV were taken by arterial tonometry and aortic systo-diastolic pressure difference was estimated using a validated model. Pulsatility of an abdominal tract of aorta was assessed by automated processing of ultrasound scans. Through a Bland–Altmann analysis, we found large biases when estimating each parameter by applying the Bramwell–Hill equation to the measured values of the other two paramters (bias, ± 1.96 SD; PWV, about 2.1 ± 2.5 m/s; pulsatility, 12 ± 14%; pressure jump, 47 ± 55 mmHg). These results indicate that the two measures are not interchangeable, and that a large part of the bias is attributable to blood pressure estimation. Further studies are needed to identify the possible sources of bias between cf-PWV and aortic pulsatility.

Keywords