Navigating Cruelty: Examining ECHR Practice in Defining a Minimum Threshold for Torture facilitated by State agents

Abstract

This article critically examines the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) practice in defining a minimum threshold for torture. It goes in-depth with torture facilitated by State agents, as stipulated in Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. While the identification of torture typically involves severe cases, the majority of instances under Article 3 pertain to degrading or inhuman treatment. Focusing on threshold cases related to freedom from degrading treatment or punishment, this article seeks to delineate the effective guarantee provided by this fundamental right within the Strasbourg organs’ judicial policy. The analysis underscores the dynamic and adaptive nature of the ECHR in interpreting and expanding the provisions of the Convention. By capitalizing on the graduated scale of degrading treatment, the Strasbourg organs have extended the protective scope of Article 3, contributing to the development of a progressive European public order. Ultimately, this exploration provides valuable insights into the judicial approach of the Strasbourg organs in defining the minimum threshold for torture perpetrated by State agents, shedding light on the evolving landscape of human rights protection in Europe.

Keywords

• torture
• state agents
• cruelty threshold
• legal interpretation