Food and Energy Security (Nov 2022)

Differences in rice yield and biomass accumulation dynamics for different direct seeding methods after wheat straw return

  • Jinyu Tian,
  • Shaoping Li,
  • Zhipeng Xing,
  • Shuang Cheng,
  • Baowei Guo,
  • Yajie Hu,
  • Haiyan Wei,
  • Hui Gao,
  • Ping Liao,
  • Huanhe Wei,
  • Hongcheng Zhang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.425
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 4
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Field experiments were performed in 2019 and 2020 to explore yield performance and biomass accumulation dynamics for different direct‐seeded rice methods after wheat straw return. The experimental treatments included two direct‐seeded rice methods (dry direct‐seeded rice and wet direct‐seeded rice) and two wheat straw return treatments (with and without wheat straw return). Wheat straw return had a negative impact on the yield and biomass of direct‐seeded rice. Compared with wet direct‐seeded rice, dry direct‐seeded rice was more negatively affected, with yield and biomass reduced by 6.7%–7.6% and 5.4%–6.5%, respectively. The yield loss was mainly associated with insufficient total spikelet numbers caused by reduced panicle numbers. A lower maximum tiller number caused by the restricted seedling tillering capacity was partly responsible for the inadequate panicle numbers in direct‐seeded rice after wheat straw return. Wheat straw return reduced the maximum and average rate of biomass accumulation, shortened the duration of effective biomass accumulation, and delayed the days to achieve the maximum rate of biomass accumulation for direct‐seeded rice. The negative effect of wheat straw return on direct‐seeded rice was concentrated mainly in the early stage; reduction in the average biomass accumulation rate in the early stage accounted for 61.1%–75.3% of the reduction in total average rate. Wet direct‐seeded rice had a higher average rate and amount of biomass accumulation at the early stage, a greater maximum tiller number, as well as a stronger photosynthetic ability and grain filling ability after heading, which contributed to improving panicle number and total spikelet number, ultimately increasing yield and biomass compared with dry direct‐seeded rice. These results demonstrate that wheat straw return reduced yield and biomass, mainly by inhibiting growth in the early stage of direct‐seeded rice. However, the wet direct‐seeding method decreased the losses in yield and biomass after wheat straw return.

Keywords