JCO Global Oncology (Dec 2021)

Survival Outcomes of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma at a Tertiary Care Center in North India (IMAGe: 001A Study)

  • Uday Yanamandra,
  • Rajni Sharma,
  • Siddharth Shankar,
  • Shikha Yadav,
  • Rajan Kapoor,
  • Suman Pramanik,
  • Ankur Ahuja,
  • Rajiv Kumar,
  • Sanjeevan Sharma,
  • Satyaranjan Das,
  • Tathagata Chatterjee,
  • Venkatesan Somasundaram,
  • Tarun Verma,
  • Kundan Mishra,
  • Jasjit Singh,
  • Ajay Sharma,
  • Velu Nair

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00625
Journal volume & issue
no. 7
pp. 704 – 715

Abstract

Read online

PURPOSEThe outcomes of patients with myeloma from developing countries are often lacking because of poor record maintenance. Publications from such settings are also limited because of the retrospective nature of the data collection. Information technology can bridge these gaps in developing countries with real-time data maintenance. We present the real-time survival data of the patients with myeloma from a tertiary care center in North India using one such indigenously built software.PATIENTS AND METHODSThese are real-time data of all patients with myeloma presenting to a tertiary care center from North India. The patient characteristics (demographics, baseline disease characteristics, risk stratification, and outcomes) were recorded contemporaneously. The survival of the study population was analyzed and grouped based on various disease characteristics at diagnosis.RESULTSThe median age of the study population (N = 696) was 65.9 (34.9-94.9) years with male predominance (65%). The median follow-up was 3.7 years (0-18.6 years) with the median overall survival (OS) not achieved. The OS of the study population at 1, 3, and 5 years was 94% (n = 558), 87.5% (n = 394), and 83.1% (n = 267), respectively. Most of the patients presented in advanced stages based on International Staging System (III:70%). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the presence of weight loss (P = .01), renal dysfunction (P = .047), and anemia at diagnosis (P = .004) had a significant impact on survival. On Cox proportional model univariate analysis, the presence of renal dysfunction, anemia, and weight loss had the significant hazard ratio of 1.68 (1-2.82, P = .049), 3.18 (1.39-7.29, P = .0063), and 2.81 (1.22-6.42, P = .014), respectively, whereas on multivariate analysis of hypercalcemia, renal disease, anemia, and bone disease (CRAB) features, only anemia was found to have a significant hazard ratio of 2.56 (1.01-6.47, P = .046).CONCLUSIONThe real-world data show OS comparable with the published western literature. Only anemia was found to have significant impact on survival. The use of such software can aid in better data-keeping in resource-constrained settings.