Gut and Liver (Jan 2024)

A Multicenter Survey of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in 2019 at Korean Medical Institutions

  • Jun Woo Park,
  • Tae Gyun Kim,
  • Kwang Bum Cho,
  • Jeong Seok Kim,
  • Jin Woong Cho,
  • Jung Won Jeon,
  • Sun Gyo Lim,
  • Chan Gyoo Kim,
  • Hong Jun Park,
  • Tae Jun Kim,
  • Eun Sun Kim,
  • Su Jin Jeong,
  • Yong Hwan Kwon,
  • The Research for Multidisciplinary Therapeutic Endoscopy group of Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl230174
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 1
pp. 77 – 84

Abstract

Read online

Background/Aims: This study aimed to review the indications, methods, cooperation, complications, and outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Methods: Questionnaires were sent to 200 hospitals, of which 62 returned their questionnaires, with a response rate of approximately 30%. Descriptive statistics were calculated to analyze the responses to the questionnaires. Results: In 2019, a total of 1,052 PEGs were performed in 1,017 patients at 62 hospitals. The main group who underwent PEG was older adult patients with brain disease, particularly stroke. Nutritional supply was an important purpose of the PEG procedure. “The pull method” was the most commonly used for initial PEG insertion. The complications related to PEG were mostly mild, with leakage being the most common. Patients who underwent PEG procedures were primarily educated regarding the post-procedure management and complications related to PEG. Preoperative meetings were skipped at >50% of the institutions. Regarding the cooperation between the nutrition support team (NST) and the physician performing PEG, few endoscopists answered that they cooperated with NST before and after PEG. Moreover, the rate of NST certification obtained by physicians performing PEG and the frequency of attendance at NST-related conferences were relatively low. Conclusions: This study shows a similar trend to that found in the previous PEG guidelines. However, it covers new aspects, including team-based work for PEG procedure, nutrition support, and education for patients and guardians. Therefore, each medical institution needs to select an appropriate method considering the medical environment and doctor’s abilities.

Keywords