PLoS Medicine (Jun 2022)

Radiotherapy to the prostate for men with metastatic prostate cancer in the UK and Switzerland: Long-term results from the STAMPEDE randomised controlled trial

  • Chris C. Parker,
  • Nicholas D. James,
  • Christopher D. Brawley,
  • Noel W. Clarke,
  • Adnan Ali,
  • Claire L. Amos,
  • Gerhardt Attard,
  • Simon Chowdhury,
  • Adrian Cook,
  • William Cross,
  • David P. Dearnaley,
  • Hassan Douis,
  • Duncan C. Gilbert,
  • Clare Gilson,
  • Silke Gillessen,
  • Alex Hoyle,
  • Rob J. Jones,
  • Ruth E. Langley,
  • Zafar I. Malik,
  • Malcolm D. Mason,
  • David Matheson,
  • Robin Millman,
  • Mary Rauchenberger,
  • Hannah Rush,
  • J Martin Russell,
  • Hannah Sweeney,
  • Amit Bahl,
  • Alison Birtle,
  • Lisa Capaldi,
  • Omar Din,
  • Daniel Ford,
  • Joanna Gale,
  • Ann Henry,
  • Peter Hoskin,
  • Mohammed Kagzi,
  • Anna Lydon,
  • Joe M. O’Sullivan,
  • Sangeeta A. Paisey,
  • Omi Parikh,
  • Delia Pudney,
  • Vijay Ramani,
  • Peter Robson,
  • Narayanan Nair Srihari,
  • Jacob Tanguay,
  • Mahesh K. B. Parmar,
  • Matthew R. Sydes,
  • for the STAMPEDE Trial Collaborative Group

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 6

Abstract

Read online

Background STAMPEDE has previously reported that radiotherapy (RT) to the prostate improved overall survival (OS) for patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer with low metastatic burden, but not those with high-burden disease. In this final analysis, we report long-term findings on the primary outcome measure of OS and on the secondary outcome measures of symptomatic local events, RT toxicity events, and quality of life (QoL). Methods and findings Patients were randomised at secondary care sites in the United Kingdom and Switzerland between January 2013 and September 2016, with 1:1 stratified allocation: 1,029 to standard of care (SOC) and 1,032 to SOC+RT. No masking of the treatment allocation was employed. A total of 1,939 had metastatic burden classifiable, with 42% low burden and 58% high burden, balanced by treatment allocation. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses used Cox regression and flexible parametric models (FPMs), adjusted for stratification factors age, nodal involvement, the World Health Organization (WHO) performance status, regular aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, and planned docetaxel use. QoL in the first 2 years on trial was assessed using prospectively collected patient responses to QLQ-30 questionnaire. Patients were followed for a median of 61.3 months. Prostate RT improved OS in patients with low, but not high, metastatic burden (respectively: 202 deaths in SOC versus 156 in SOC+RT, hazard ratio (HR) = 0·64, 95% CI 0.52, 0.79, p Conclusions Prostate RT improves OS, without detriment in QoL, in men with low-burden, newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer, indicating that it should be recommended as a SOC. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00268476, ISRCTN.com ISRCTN78818544. Chris C Parker and colleagues report long-term findings on overall survival and local complications in men with metastatic prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy. Author summary Why was this study done? Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in males. Radiotherapy (RT) to the prostate is widely used as a radical treatment for nonmetastatic prostate cancer. A comparison was added to the STAMPEDE protocol to assess whether RT to the prostate would also be helpful for males with metastatic prostate cancer. A benefit in survival was targeted. The trial previously reported a clinically relevant, statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit for patients with a low metastatic burden but not for men with a high metastatic burden. This long-term analysis assesses survival with substantially longer follow-up and more events and looked also at complications of local disease. What did the researchers do and find? A randomised controlled trial of adding RT to the prostate to standard of care (SOC) was incorporated into the STAMPEDE protocol. More than 2,000 patients joined the comparison between 2013 and 2016. The data set was frozen in 2021 and analysed using standard methods. There was a clear improvement in survival with prostate RT in the low metastatic burden group. There was no improvement in survival with prostate RT in the high metastatic burden group. Symptomatic local progression and the need for later local intervention were improved with RT in the low metastatic burden group. In the low metastatic burden group, the improvement with RT was similar whether the RT was given with a daily schedule (over 4.5 weeks) or a weekly schedule (over 6 weeks). The adverse effects of RT were manageable without any impact on long-term quality of life (QoL). What do these findings mean? Prostate RT is a relatively cheap, widely accessible, and well-tolerated treatment. Prostate RT is indicated in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer with a low metastatic burden. RT to the prostate is not routinely indicated for patients with a high metastatic burden.