HemaSphere (Nov 2024)

Results of the prospective EORTC Children Leukemia Group study 58081 in precursor B‐ and T‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

  • Carine Domenech,
  • Michal Kicinski,
  • Barbara De Moerloose,
  • Caroline Piette,
  • Wadih A. Chahla,
  • Laure Kornreich,
  • Marlène Pasquet,
  • Anne Uyttebroeck,
  • Alexandre Theron,
  • Marilyne Poirée,
  • Chloé Arfeuille,
  • Marleen Bakkus,
  • Nathalie Grardel,
  • Catherine Paillard,
  • Claire Freycon,
  • Frédéric Millot,
  • Pauline Simon,
  • Pierre Philippet,
  • Claire Pluchart,
  • Stefan Suciu,
  • Pierre Rohrlich,
  • Alina Ferster,
  • Yves Bertrand,
  • Hélène Cavé,
  • for the Children's Leukemia Group (CLG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hem3.70025
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 11
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Here, we report the results of the prospective cohort study EORTC‐CLG 58081 and compare them to the control arm of the randomized phase 3 trial EORTC‐CLG 58951, on which treatment recommendations were built. In both studies, patients aged 1–18 years with BCR::ABL1 negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia of the B‐lineage (B‐ALL) or T‐lineage (T‐ALL) were treated using a BFM backbone without cranial irradiation. Similarly to the control arm of 58951, prednisolone (PRED) 60 mg/m2/day was used for induction therapy, but a few modifications were made. Dexamethasone (DXM) was used in average‐risk 2 (AR2) T‐ALL and B‐ALL during induction, 10 and 6 mg/m2/day, respectively. Leucovorin rescue was delayed to 42 h instead of 36 h after initiation of high‐dose methotrexate, and a postconsolidation MRD time point was added to stratify patients. Between 2011 and 2017, 835 patients were prospectively enrolled in the 58081 study. Overall, the 5‐year event‐free survival (EFS) was 84.8% versus 83.6% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76–1.21]) for 58081 versus 58951 considered as a control group, respectively, 84.3% versus 84.9% (HR, 1.06 [99% CI: 0.75–1.49]) in B‐ALL but 87.3% versus 76.6% (HR, 0.59 [99% CI: 0.28–1.24]) in T‐ALL. The comparison between the two studies regarding EFS differed by risk group (p = 0.012). The HR was 2.15 (99% CI: 0.67–6.85) for very low‐risk but 0.34 (99% CI: 0.13–0.89) for AR2. The particularly favorable results observed in the T‐ALLs and AR2 subgroups suggest the benefit of using DXM in specific patient groups and highlight the importance of risk stratification.