Journal of Clinical and Translational Science (Jan 2023)

Priority skills for equity-focused, evidence-based cancer control in community-based organizations: A group concept mapping analysis with academics and practitioners

  • Shoba Ramanadhan,
  • Maggie Weese,
  • Scott R. Rosas,
  • Jennifer L. Cruz,
  • Cindy Chwa,
  • Madison K. Rivard,
  • Shinelle Kirk,
  • Albert Whitaker,
  • Judi Kirk,
  • Karen Peterson,
  • Arthur Eisenkraft

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.586
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Introduction: Community-based organizations (CBOs) are important equity-promoting delivery channels for evidence-based interventions (EBIs). However, CBO practitioners often cannot access needed support to build EBI skills. Additionally, the capacity-building literature is hindered by inconsistent definitions, limited use of validated measures, and an emphasis on the perspectives of EBI developers versus implementers. To address these gaps, we explored commonalities and differences between CBO practitioners and academics in conceptualizing and prioritizing core EBI skills. Methods: We utilized Group Concept Mapping, a mixed-methods approach connecting qualitative data (e.g., regarding the range of critical EBI skills) and quantitative data (e.g., sorting and ranking data regarding unique skills) to create conceptual maps integrating perspectives from diverse participants. A total of 34 practitioners and 30 academics working with cancer inequities participated in the study. Results: Participants nominated 581 core skills for EBI use, and our team (including practitioners and academics) identified 98 unique skills from this list. Participants sorted them into conceptual groups, yielding five clusters: (1) using data and evaluation, (2) selecting and adapting EBIs, (3) connecting with community members, (4) building diverse and equitable partnerships, and (5) managing EBI implementation. The ordering of importance and presence of skill clusters were similar across groups. Overall, importance was rated higher than presence, suggesting capacity gaps. Conclusions: There are helpful commonalities between practitioners’ and academics’ views of core EBI skills in CBOs and apparent capacity gaps. However, underlying patterns suggest that differences between the groups’ perceptions warrant further exploration.

Keywords