Mechanical behavior of hybrid glenoid components compared to all‐PE components: a finite element analysis

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this finite element study was to compare bone and cement stresses and implant micromotions among all‐polyethylene (PE) and hybrid glenoid components. The hypothesis was that, compared to all‐PE components, hybrid components yield lower bone and cement stresses with smaller micromotions. Methods Implant micromotions and cement and bone stresses were compared among 4 all PE (U‐PG, U‐KG, A‐KG, I‐KG) and 2 hybrid (E‐hCG, I‐hPG) virtually implanted glenoid components. Glenohumeral joint reaction forces were applied at five loading regions (central, anterior, posterior, superior and inferior). Implant failure was assumed if glenoid micromotion exceeded 75 µm or cement stresses exceeded 4 MPa. The critical cement volume (CCV) was based on the percentage of cement volume that exceeded 4 MPa. Results were pooled and summarized in boxplots, and differences evaluated using pairwise Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. Results Differences in cement stress were found only between the I‐hPG hybrid component (2.9 ± 1.0 MPa) and all‐PE keeled‐components (U‐KG: 3.8 ± 0.9 MPa, p = 0.017; A‐KG: 3.6 ± 0.5 MPa, p = 0.014; I‐KG: 3.6 ± 0.6 MPa, p = 0.040). There were no differences in cortical and trabecular bone stresses among glenoid components. The E‐hCG hybrid component exceeded micromotions of 75 µm in 2 patients. There were no differences in %CCV among glenoid components. Conclusions Finite element analyses reveal that compared to all‐PE glenoid components, hybrid components yield similar average stresses within bone and cement. Finally, risk of fatigue failure of the cement mantle is equal for hybrid and all‐PE components, as no difference in %CCV was observed. Level of evidence IV, in‐silico.

Keywords

• Total shoulder arthroplasty
• Hybrid glenoid component
• Micromotion
• Stress
• Finite element analysis