PLoS ONE (Jan 2024)

Wild imitating vs greenhouse cultivated Dendrobium huoshanense: Chemical quality differences.

  • Li Hu,
  • Shiwen Wang,
  • Lin Zhang,
  • Liangliang Shang,
  • Ruiye Zong,
  • Jinyan Li,
  • Zhanghua Wu,
  • Yuanjun Meng,
  • Yafeng Dai,
  • Yuechun Huang,
  • Gang Wei

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291376
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 1
p. e0291376

Abstract

Read online

Dendrobium huoshanense (D. huoshanense) has been used as functional food supplements and herbal medicines for preventing and managing diseases with a long history in China. Due to its endangered natural resources and huge demand, people tend to cultivate D. huoshanense to protect this species. However, the quality of wild and cultivated herbs of the same species may change. This work quantified and compared the main quality traits and chemical components of wild imitating and greenhouse cultivated D. huoshanense with different growth years. As a result, wild and cultivated D. huoshanense had similar chemical composition, but there are significant differences in the content of many ingredients (polysaccharides, flavonoids, nucleosides, bibenzyls, lignans and volatile compounds). And the contents of many of these components increased with growing years. In addition, multivariate statistical analyses have been applied to classify and evaluate samples from different cultivation modes according to these components. In conclusion, our results demonstrated that the overall quality of greenhouse cultivated D. huoshanense was not as good as wild-grown, but this mode can be a promising and sustainable way of producing D. huoshanense.