Frontiers in Neuroscience (Jul 2023)

Development of risk prediction models for depression combining genetic and early life risk factors

  • Tianyuan Lu,
  • Patrícia Pelufo Silveira,
  • Patrícia Pelufo Silveira,
  • Celia M. T. Greenwood,
  • Celia M. T. Greenwood,
  • Celia M. T. Greenwood,
  • Celia M. T. Greenwood

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1143496
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundBoth genetic and early life risk factors play important roles in the pathogenesis and progression of adult depression. However, the interplay between these risk factors and their added value to risk prediction models have not been fully elucidated.MethodsLeveraging a meta-analysis of major depressive disorder genome-wide association studies (N = 45,591 cases and 97,674 controls), we developed and optimized a polygenic risk score for depression using LDpred in a model selection dataset from the UK Biobank (N = 130,092 European ancestry individuals). In a UK Biobank test dataset (N = 278,730 European ancestry individuals), we tested whether the polygenic risk score and early life risk factors were associated with each other and compared their associations with depression phenotypes. Finally, we conducted joint predictive modeling to combine this polygenic risk score with early life risk factors by stepwise regression, and assessed the model performance in identifying individuals at high risk of depression.ResultsIn the UK Biobank test dataset, the polygenic risk score for depression was moderately associated with multiple early life risk factors. For instance, a one standard deviation increase in the polygenic risk score was associated with 1.16-fold increased odds of frequent domestic violence (95% CI: 1.14–1.19) and 1.09-fold increased odds of not having access to medical care as a child (95% CI: 1.05–1.14). However, the polygenic risk score was more strongly associated with depression phenotypes than most early life risk factors. A joint predictive model integrating the polygenic risk score, early life risk factors, age and sex achieved an AUROC of 0.6766 for predicting strictly defined major depressive disorder, while a model without the polygenic risk score and a model without any early life risk factors had an AUROC of 0.6593 and 0.6318, respectively.ConclusionWe have developed a polygenic risk score to partly capture the genetic liability to depression. Although genetic and early life risk factors can be correlated, joint predictive models improved risk stratification despite limited improvement in magnitude, and may be explored as tools to better identify individuals at high risk of depression.

Keywords