Enteroscopy versus Video Capsule Endoscopy for Automatic Diagnosis of Small Bowel Disorders—A Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Applications
Stefan Lucian Popa,
Bogdan Stancu,
Abdulrahman Ismaiel,
Daria Claudia Turtoi,
Vlad Dumitru Brata,
Traian Adrian Duse,
Roxana Bolchis,
Alexandru Marius Padureanu,
Miruna Oana Dita,
Atamyrat Bashimov,
Victor Incze,
Edoardo Pinna,
Simona Grad,
Andrei-Vasile Pop,
Dinu Iuliu Dumitrascu,
Mihai Alexandru Munteanu,
Teodora Surdea-Blaga,
Florin Vasile Mihaileanu
Affiliations
Stefan Lucian Popa
2nd Medical Department, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Bogdan Stancu
2nd Surgical Department, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Abdulrahman Ismaiel
2nd Medical Department, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Daria Claudia Turtoi
Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu“ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Vlad Dumitru Brata
Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu“ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Traian Adrian Duse
Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu“ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Roxana Bolchis
Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu“ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Alexandru Marius Padureanu
Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu“ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Miruna Oana Dita
Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu“ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Atamyrat Bashimov
Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu“ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Victor Incze
Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu“ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Edoardo Pinna
Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu“ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Simona Grad
2nd Medical Department, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Andrei-Vasile Pop
2nd Medical Department, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Dinu Iuliu Dumitrascu
Department of Anatomy, “Iuliu Hatieganu“ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Mihai Alexandru Munteanu
Department of Medical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania
Teodora Surdea-Blaga
2nd Medical Department, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Florin Vasile Mihaileanu
2nd Surgical Department, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Background: Small bowel disorders present a diagnostic challenge due to the limited accessibility of the small intestine. Accurate diagnosis is made with the aid of specific procedures, like capsule endoscopy or double-ballon enteroscopy, but they are not usually solicited and not widely accessible. This study aims to assess and compare the diagnostic effectiveness of enteroscopy and video capsule endoscopy (VCE) when combined with artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for the automatic detection of small bowel diseases. Materials and methods: We performed an extensive literature search for relevant studies about AI applications capable of identifying small bowel disorders using enteroscopy and VCE, published between 2012 and 2023, employing PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Embase, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Results: Our investigation discovered a total of 27 publications, out of which 21 studies assessed the application of VCE, while the remaining 6 articles analyzed the enteroscopy procedure. The included studies portrayed that both investigations, enhanced by AI, exhibited a high level of diagnostic accuracy. Enteroscopy demonstrated superior diagnostic capability, providing precise identification of small bowel pathologies with the added advantage of enabling immediate therapeutic intervention. The choice between these modalities should be guided by clinical context, patient preference, and resource availability. Studies with larger sample sizes and prospective designs are warranted to validate these results and optimize the integration of AI in small bowel diagnostics. Conclusions: The current analysis demonstrates that both enteroscopy and VCE with AI augmentation exhibit comparable diagnostic performance for the automatic detection of small bowel disorders.