The Astrophysical Journal (Jan 2023)

An FRB Sent Me a DM: Constraining the Electron Column of the Milky Way Halo with Fast Radio Burst Dispersion Measures from CHIME/FRB

  • Amanda M. Cook,
  • Mohit Bhardwaj,
  • B. M. Gaensler,
  • Paul Scholz,
  • Gwendolyn M. Eadie,
  • Alex S. Hill,
  • Victoria M. Kaspi,
  • Kiyoshi W. Masui,
  • Alice P. Curtin,
  • Fengqiu Adam Dong,
  • Emmanuel Fonseca,
  • Antonio Herrera-Martin,
  • Jane Kaczmarek,
  • Adam E. Lanman,
  • Mattias Lazda,
  • Calvin Leung,
  • Bradley W. Meyers,
  • Daniele Michilli,
  • Ayush Pandhi,
  • Aaron B. Pearlman,
  • Ziggy Pleunis,
  • Scott Ransom,
  • Mubdi Rahman,
  • Ketan R. Sand,
  • Kaitlyn Shin,
  • Kendrick Smith,
  • Ingrid Stairs,
  • David C. Stenning

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acbbd0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 946, no. 2
p. 58

Abstract

Read online

The CHIME/FRB project has detected hundreds of fast radio bursts (FRBs), providing an unparalleled population to statistically probe the foreground media that they illuminate. One such foreground medium is the ionized halo of the Milky Way (MW). We estimate the total Galactic electron column density from FRB dispersion measures (DMs) as a function of Galactic latitude using four different estimators, including ones that assume spherical symmetry of the ionized MW halo and ones that imply more latitudinal variation in density. Our observation-based constraints of the total Galactic DM contribution for ∣ b ∣ ≥ 30°, depending on the Galactic latitude and selected model, span 87.8–141 pc cm ^−3 . This constraint implies upper limits on the MW halo DM contribution that range over 52–111 pc cm ^−3 . We discuss the viability of various gas density profiles for the MW halo that have been used to estimate the halo’s contribution to DMs of extragalactic sources. Several models overestimate the DM contribution, especially when assuming higher halo gas masses (∼3.5 × 10 ^12 M _⊙ ). Some halo models predict a higher MW halo DM contribution than can be supported by our observations unless the effect of feedback is increased within them, highlighting the impact of feedback processes in galaxy formation.

Keywords