Burns Open (Jul 2024)
A five-year retrospective antibiogram review in the paediatric burns unit at a tertiary South African Hospital
Abstract
Background: There is a global concern regarding increasing colonization and/or infection of paediatric burns patients with multi-drug-resistant organisms, especially in Africa. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistant patterns enables clinicians to opt for the most appropriate empiric antimicrobial agent according to the unit’s susceptibility profile. Objective: This study sought to compile unit-specific antibiograms comparing the organism prevalence and their antimicrobial resistance trends in the paediatric burns unit, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital (CHBAH) from January 2015 to December 2019. Methods: A retrospective, laboratory-based review was conducted of bacterial and fungal isolates including antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) data from blood cultures and tissue samples. Enterobacterales, non-fermenters, gram-positive organisms, and yeasts were analysed as a percentage of total positive blood cultures comparing 2015–2017 to 2018–2019 data. Analysis of antimicrobial resistance trends was performed for extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), extensively-drug-resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter baumannii, and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) for the years 2015, 2017, and 2019. Results: A total of 1243 blood culture isolates were studied with A.baumannii (208/1243;17 %), coagulase negative staphylococci (141/1243; 11 %) and Candida auris (53/1243; 4 %) representing the predominant gram-negative bacteria, gram-positive bacteria, and yeast, respectively. A significant decrease in ESBLs (p = 0.00) was noted with a rise in CREs (p = 0.00) during the study period. Majority of the A. baumannii were XDR (≥77 %) despite an appreciable decrease. A notable decrease in MRSA (p = 0.00) isolates was observed. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (72/275; 26 %) was the leading organism recovered from a total of 275 tissue isolates. Conclusion: The results of this study encourage review of the current antimicrobial choices in the unit for empiric antibacterial cover. Due to the low numbers of yeasts, we cannot comment on the institution of early antifungal strategies. We support reinforced infection prevention and control practices as well as antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.
