PLoS ONE (Jan 2021)

Phenotypic differences between highlanders and lowlanders in Papua New Guinea.

  • Mathilde André,
  • Nicolas Brucato,
  • Sébastien Plutniak,
  • Jason Kariwiga,
  • John Muke,
  • Adeline Morez,
  • Matthew Leavesley,
  • Mayukh Mondal,
  • François-Xavier Ricaut

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253921
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 7
p. e0253921

Abstract

Read online

ObjectivesAltitude is one of the most demanding environmental pressures for human populations. Highlanders from Asia, America and Africa have been shown to exhibit different biological adaptations, but Oceanian populations remain understudied [Woolcock et al., 1972; Cotes et al., 1974; Senn et al., 2010]. We tested the hypothesis that highlanders phenotypically differ from lowlanders in Papua New Guinea, as a result of inhabiting the highest mountains in Oceania for at least 20,000 years.Materials and methodsWe collected data for 13 different phenotypes related to altitude for 162 Papua New Guineans living at high altitude (Mont Wilhelm, 2,300-2,700 m above sea level (a.s.l.) and low altitude (Daru, ResultsSix phenotypes were significantly different between Papua New Guinean highlanders and lowlanders. Highlanders show shorter height (p-value = 0.001), smaller waist circumference (p-value = 0.002), larger Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (p-value = 0.008), larger maximal (p-value = 3.20e -4) and minimal chest depth (p-value = 2.37e -5) and higher haemoglobin concentration (p-value = 3.36e -4).DiscussionOur study reports specific phenotypes in Papua New Guinean highlanders potentially related to altitude adaptation. Similar to other human groups adapted to high altitude, the evolutionary history of Papua New Guineans appears to have also followed an adaptive biological strategy for altitude.