Medicina (Jun 2023)

Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Assessment Using a Minimalistic Approach, with and without Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT)—A Comparative Clinical Trial

  • K. Padmanabhan Akhil,
  • Rashmi Pramashivaiah,
  • Munivenkatappa Laxmaiah Venkatesh Prabhuji,
  • Robina Tasleem,
  • Hussain Almubarak,
  • Ghadah Khaled Bahamdan,
  • Alexander Maniangat Luke,
  • Krishna Prasad Shetty,
  • Niher Tabassum Snigdha,
  • Shaeesta Khaleelahmed Bhavikatti

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061178
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 59, no. 6
p. 1178

Abstract

Read online

Background and Objective: A narrow alveolar ridge is an obstacle to optimal rehabilitation of the dentition. There are several complex and invasive techniques to counter the ridge augmentation dilemma, with most of them exhibiting low feasibility. Hence, this randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a Minimalistic Ridge Augmentation (MRA) technique, in conjunction with low-level laser therapy (LLLT). Materials and Methods: A total of 20 patients (n = 20) were selected, with 10 assigned to the test group (MRA+LLLT) and the other 10 to the control group (MRA). A vertical incision of approximately 10 mm was placed mesial to the defect and tunneled to create a subperiosteal pouch across the entire width of the defect. At the test sites, a diode laser (AnARC FoxTM Surgical Laser 810 nm) was used to deliver LLLT (parameters: 100 mW, with a maximum energy distribution of 6 J/cm2 in the continuous wave mode for 60 s per point) to the exposed bone surface inside the pouch, followed by graft (G-Graft, SurgiwearTM, Shahjahanpur, India) deposition with a bone graft carrier. The control sites were not irradiated with a laser. Results: A horizontal ridge width gain of >2 mm was observed in both groups. The changes in bone density for the test and control groups were −136 ± 236.08 HU and −44.30 ± 180.89 HU, respectively. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between the test and control groups in these parameters. Conclusion: The study findings reveal that the MRA technique is relatively simple and feasible for alveolar ridge augmentation. The role of LLLT in the process requires further elucidation.

Keywords