Frontiers in Medicine (Feb 2023)

Fine-tuning characterization of patients with interstitial pneumonia and an underlying autoimmune disease in real-world practice: We get closer with Nailfold videocapillaroscopy

  • Fredeswinda Isabel Romero-Bueno,
  • Maria Jesús Rodríguez-Nieto,
  • Carmelo Palacios Miras,
  • Lina Martínez Estupiñán,
  • Maria José Martínez-Becerra,
  • Maria Carmen Vegas Sánchez,
  • Oderay Mabel Cedeño Díaz,
  • Olga Sánchez-Pernaute,
  • The NEREA Autoimmune ILD Study Group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1057643
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

ObjectivesTo assess performance of interstitial pneumonia (IP) with autoimmune features (IPAF) criteria in clinical practice and describe the utility of additional workup in identifying patients with underlying connective tissue diseases (CTD).MethodsWe set a retrospective study of our patients with autoimmune IP, who were allocated to CTD-IP, IPAF or undifferentiated autoimmune IP (uAIP) subgroups according to the updated classification criteria. Presence of the process-related variables comprising IPAF defining domains was scrutinized in all patients, and, when available, the results of nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) were recorded.ResultsThirty nine out of 118 patients, accounting for 71% of former undifferentiated cases, fulfilled IPAF criteria. Arthritis and Raynaud’s phenomenon were prevalent in this subgroup. While systemic sclerosis-specific autoantibodies were restricted to CTD-IP patients, anti-tRNA synthetase antibodies were also present in IPAF. In contrast, rheumatoid factor, anti-Ro antibodies and ANA nucleolar patterns could be found in all subgroups. Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) / possible UIP were the most frequently observed radiographic patterns Therefore, the presence of thoracic multicompartimental findings as also performance of open lung biopsies were useful in characterizing as IPAF those UIP cases lacking a clinical domain. Interestingly, we could observe NVC abnormalities in 54% of IPAF and 36% of uAIP tested patients, even though many of them did not report Raynaud’s phenomenon.ConclusionBesides application of IPAF criteria, distribution of IPAF defining variables along with NVC exams help identify more homogeneous phenotypic subgroups of autoimmune IP of potential relevance beyond clinical diagnosis.

Keywords